Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "get_kind".
Did you mean:
get_id
2017 Jul 14
0
[PATCH 07/27] daemon: Reimplement ‘is_dir’, ‘is_file’ and ‘is_symlink’ APIs in OCaml.
...n, Inc.,
+ * 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
+ *)
+
+open Printf
+open Unix
+
+let rec is_file ?(followsymlinks = false) path =
+ let sysroot = Sysroot.sysroot () in
+ let chroot = Chroot.create sysroot ~name:(sprintf "is_file: %s" path) in
+ Chroot.f chroot get_kind (path, followsymlinks) = Some S_REG
+
+and is_dir ?(followsymlinks = false) path =
+ let sysroot = Sysroot.sysroot () in
+ let chroot = Chroot.create sysroot ~name:(sprintf "is_dir: %s" path) in
+ Chroot.f chroot get_kind (path, followsymlinks) = Some S_DIR
+
+and is_symlink path =
+...
2017 Jul 14
45
[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml.
Previously posted as part of the mega utilities/inspection
series here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00232.html
What I've done is to extract just the parts related to rewriting
daemon APIs in OCaml, rebase them on top of the current master, fix a
few things, and recompile and test everything.
Rich.
2017 Jun 03
12
[PATCH v2 00/12] Allow APIs to be implemented in OCaml.
Version 1 was here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00003.html
This patch series reimplements a few more APIs in OCaml, including
some very important core APIs like ?list_filesystems? and ?mount?.
All the tests pass after this.
The selection of APIs that I have moved may look a little random, but
in fact they are all APIs consumed by the inspection code (and some
more
2017 Jun 05
19
[PATCH v3 00/19] Allow APIs to be implemented in OCaml.
v2 was here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00008.html
This series gets as far as a working (and faster) reimplementation of
‘guestfs_list_filesystems’.
I also have another patch series on top of this one which reimplements
the inspection APIs inside the daemon, but that needs a bit more work
still, since inspection turns out to be a very large piece of code.
Rich.
2017 Jun 12
32
[PATCH v5 00/32] Refactor utilities, implement some APIs in OCaml.
This is a combination of:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00046.html
[PATCH 00/12] Refactor utility functions.
plus:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00023.html
[PATCH v3 00/19] Allow APIs to be implemented in OCaml.
with the second patches rebased on top of the utility refactoring, and
some other adjustments and extensions.
This passes
2017 Jun 19
29
[PATCH v7 00/29] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v6 was posted here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html
and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html
Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm
intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new
virt-inspector to see if I can find any
2017 Jun 15
45
[PATCH v6 00/41] Refactor utilities, reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v5:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00065.html
Since v5, this now implements inspection almost completely for Linux
and Windows guests.
Rich.
2017 Jun 21
45
[PATCH v8 00/42] Refactor utilities and reimplement inspection.
v7 was:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html
I believe this addresses all comments received so far.
Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images
processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is
identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid