search for: get_involved

...ed by a small Clang diagnostic infelicity > > that I looked into fixing it, and came up with what appears to this > > neophyte to be a trivial 2-line fix. As a first-time contributor to > Clang, > > I read the instructions for contributing at > > <http://clang.llvm.org/get_involved.html>: > > > > "Clang is a subproject of the LLVM Project, but has its own mailing > > lists because the communities have people with different interests. The > > two clang lists are: > > • cfe-commits - This list is for patch submission/discussion....

...also welcome comments and requests on the CentOS Mailing lists ( https://lists.centos.org/ ) and the CentOS IRC Channels ( #centos on irc.freenode.net ), however we have a more focused audience in the RDO venues. To get involved in the OpenStack RPM packaging effort, see https://www.rdoproject.org/Get_involved and https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Cloud Join us in #rdo on the Freenode IRC network, and follow us at @RDOCommunity on Twitter. And, if you're going to be in Tokyo for the OpenStack Summit next week, join us on Wednesday at lunch for the RDO community meetup ( http://sched.co/4M...

I'm not sure a decision was already made as such. I think it's more that there was a flurry of conversation last time with lots of conflicting opinions, and then the conversation just fizzled out. FWIW, I like Phabricator but I'm willing to try GitHub. Overall I think we should take the same approach that eventually led to Phabricator being widely adopted: We should allow GitHub

...also welcome comments and requests on the CentOS Mailing lists ( https://lists.centos.org/ ) and the CentOS IRC Channels ( #centos on irc.freenode.net ), however we have a more focused audience in the RDO venues. To get involved in the OpenStack RPM packaging effort, see https://www.rdoproject.org/Get_involved and https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Cloud Join us in #rdo on the Freenode IRC network, and follow us at @RDOCommunity on Twitter. And, if you're going to be in Tokyo for the OpenStack Summit next week, join us on Wednesday at lunch for the RDO community meetup ( http://sched.co/4M...

Hello, This is a follow-up to Adam’s original RFC (RFC: First-class Matrix type, [1] <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/126871.html>) <https://confluence.sd.apple.com/pages/createpage.action?spaceKey=DPT&title=1&linkCreation=true&fromPageId=1360610956> and his follow-up ([RFC] Matrix support (take 2, [2

On 30/01/2014 22:57, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com> wrote: >> On 30/01/2014 22:06, Daniel Berlin wrote: >>> Actually, the policy actually says the right thing, you removed a >>> sentence, which says: >>> "Please contact the oversight group for more details." >> >> To be clear, I