Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "get_internal_s3_generi".
Did you mean:
get_internal_s3_generis
2023 Apr 28
1
Should '@" now be listed in tools:::.get_internal_S3_generics() ?
...with ?roxygen2? documentation. ?roxygen2? generated NAMESPACE added `@.newclass` as a newly exported function, not as a S3method.
At first I thought this must be a bug in roxygen2 and they lag behind the new developments in R. But after some investigation I found that ?roxygen2? is using tools:::.get_internal_S3_generis() to decide if the method should be exported as S3method or not. For some reason ?@<-? is listed in there, but ?@? is not.
Am I missing some context, or is this an oversight?
Kind regards,
Karolis Koncevicius
2023 Apr 28
1
Should '@" now be listed in tools:::.get_internal_S3_generics() ?
...ygen2? documentation. ?roxygen2? generated NAMESPACE added `@.newclass` as a newly exported function, not as a S3method.
>
> At first I thought this must be a bug in roxygen2 and they lag behind the new developments in R. But after some investigation I found that ?roxygen2? is using tools:::.get_internal_S3_generis() to decide if the method should be exported as S3method or not. For some reason ?@<-? is listed in there, but ?@? is not.
>
> Am I missing some context, or is this an oversight?
>
> Kind regards,
> Karolis Koncevicius
2023 Apr 28
1
Should '@" now be listed in tools:::.get_internal_S3_generics() ?
...oxygen2? generated NAMESPACE added
> `@.newclass` as a newly exported function, not as a S3method.
> >
> > At first I thought this must be a bug in roxygen2 and they lag behind
> the new developments in R. But after some investigation I found that
> ?roxygen2? is using tools:::.get_internal_S3_generis() to decide if the
> method should be exported as S3method or not. For some reason ?@<-? is
> listed in there, but ?@? is not.
> >
> > Am I missing some context, or is this an oversight?
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Karolis Koncevicius
>
> ________________...
2023 Apr 28
1
Should '@" now be listed in tools:::.get_internal_S3_generics() ?
...on. ?roxygen2? generated NAMESPACE added `@.newclass` as a newly exported function, not as a S3method.
>> >
>> > At first I thought this must be a bug in roxygen2 and they lag behind the new developments in R. But after some investigation I found that ?roxygen2? is using tools:::.get_internal_S3_generis() to decide if the method should be exported as S3method or not. For some reason ?@<-? is listed in there, but ?@? is not.
>> >
>> > Am I missing some context, or is this an oversight?
>> >
>> > Kind regards,
>> > Karolis Koncevicius
>>
>...
2023 Apr 28
1
Should '@" now be listed in tools:::.get_internal_S3_generics() ?
...ygen2? generated NAMESPACE added `@.newclass` as a newly exported function, not as a S3method.
>>> >
>>> > At first I thought this must be a bug in roxygen2 and they lag behind the new developments in R. But after some investigation I found that ?roxygen2? is using tools:::.get_internal_S3_generis() to decide if the method should be exported as S3method or not. For some reason ?@<-? is listed in there, but ?@? is not.
>>> >
>>> > Am I missing some context, or is this an oversight?
>>> >
>>> > Kind regards,
>>> > Karolis Koncev...
2023 Apr 29
1
Should '@" now be listed in tools:::.get_internal_S3_generics() ?
...enerated NAMESPACE added `@.newclass` as a newly exported function, not as a S3method.
>>>> >
>>>> > At first I thought this must be a bug in roxygen2 and they lag behind the new developments in R. But after some investigation I found that ?roxygen2? is using tools:::.get_internal_S3_generis() to decide if the method should be exported as S3method or not. For some reason ?@<-? is listed in there, but ?@? is not.
>>>> >
>>>> > Am I missing some context, or is this an oversight?
>>>> >
>>>> > Kind regards,
>>>>...
2023 Apr 29
1
Should '@" now be listed in tools:::.get_internal_S3_generics() ?
...ed NAMESPACE added `@.newclass` as a newly exported function, not as a S3method.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At first I thought this must be a bug in roxygen2 and they lag behind the new developments in R. But after some investigation I found that ?roxygen2? is using tools:::.get_internal_S3_generis() to decide if the method should be exported as S3method or not. For some reason ?@<-? is listed in there, but ?@? is not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am I missing some context, or is this an oversight?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kind regards,
>...
2023 Apr 30
1
Should '@" now be listed in tools:::.get_internal_S3_generics() ?
...PACE added `@.newclass` as a newly exported function, not as a S3method.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> At first I thought this must be a bug in roxygen2 and they lag behind the new developments in R. But after some investigation I found that ?roxygen2? is using tools:::.get_internal_S3_generis() to decide if the method should be exported as S3method or not. For some reason ?@<-? is listed in there, but ?@? is not.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am I missing some context, or is this an oversight?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ki...
2023 Apr 30
1
Should '@" now be listed in tools:::.get_internal_S3_generics() ?
...ed `@.newclass` as a newly exported function, not as a S3method.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> At first I thought this must be a bug in roxygen2 and they lag behind the new developments in R. But after some investigation I found that ?roxygen2? is using tools:::.get_internal_S3_generis() to decide if the method should be exported as S3method or not. For some reason ?@<-? is listed in there, but ?@? is not.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am I missing some context, or is this an oversight?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>...