search for: get_data_kraul

...7, Jon Gough (c) 2007 > > debug level is '5' > Checking device (0001/0000) (001/002) > - VendorID: 0001 > - ProductID: 0000 > - Manufacturer: unknown > - Product: unknown > - Serial Number: unknown > - Bus: 001 > Trying to match device > Device matches > get_data_krauler: no command set > Starting UPS detection process... > Asking for UPS status [Q1]... > get_data_krauler: index [03], prefix [(] > (len = 47/128).0 165.0 229.0 000 50.2 13.0 00.0 00001010 > Q1 => OK [(229.0 165.0 229.0 000 50.2 13.0 00.0 00001010] > Asking for UPS status [Q1]....

...5' Checking device (0925/1234) (001/005) - VendorID: 0925 - ProductID: 1234 - Manufacturer: ? - Product: UPS USB MON V1.4 - Serial Number: unknown - Bus: 001 Trying to match device Device matches Starting UPS detection process... Attempting to detect the UPS... Sending "Q1" command... get_data_krauler: got data: ( Wrong answer to "Q1" command. Attempting to detect the UPS... Sending "Q1" command... get_data_krauler: got data: ( Wrong answer to "Q1" command. Attempting to detect the UPS... Sending "Q1" command... get_data_krauler: got data: ( Wrong answer...

...5' Checking device (0925/1234) (001/005) - VendorID: 0925 - ProductID: 1234 - Manufacturer: ? - Product: UPS USB MON V1.4 - Serial Number: unknown - Bus: 001 Trying to match device Device matches Starting UPS detection process... Attempting to detect the UPS... Sending "Q1" command... get_data_krauler: got data: ( Wrong answer to "Q1" command. Attempting to detect the UPS... Sending "Q1" command... get_data_krauler: got data: ( Wrong answer to "Q1" command. Attempting to detect the UPS... Sending "Q1" command... get_data_krauler: got data: ( Wrong answer...

...retry feature), so we could remove the Ablerex subdriver (provided Jon tests the Krauler one to make sure it still works for the Ablerex device). If I understand correctly, the only change needed would be to change {0xffff, 0x0000, get_data_ablerex, set_data_ablerex}, to {0xffff, 0x0000, get_data_krauler, set_data_krauler}, is that correct? -- Peter Alexander Gordeev wrote: > > Author: agordeev-guest > Date: Thu Feb 8 16:43:43 2007 > New Revision: 801 > > Modified: > branches/megatec-usb/ChangeLog > branches/megatec-usb/drivers/megatec_usb.c > Log: > - dri...

On 1/23/07, Henning Brauer <hb-nut@bsws.de> wrote: > good new first: the megatec driverin 2.0.5 now works with the Online > Xanto S3000R here - well, for the very basics. > > the UPS has NO way ofidentifying itself. It also does not respond to > the power ratings query ("F"). I previously used a hacked up fentonups > driver. This means the driver cannot figure out

> Author: agordeev-guest > Date: Wed Oct 3 00:09:21 2007 > New Revision: 1136 > > Log: > - drivers/megatec_usb.c: added ability to do subdriver-specific > initialization, and moved some shared code to agiler init function > since krauler doesn't need it. [...] I'm not very thrilled about this patch: 1) Down at the subdriver level, one shouldn't use