search for: get_current_group

..._ctx(297) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(286) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(172) get_current_groups: user is in 1 groups: 99 [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(436) pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(172) get_current_groups: user is in 1 groups: 99 [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/passw...

Hi, I have a very odd problem which perhaps is not related to Samba but to be sure... I have a RH6.2 2.2.20 ACLs Samba server 2.2.2 and everything is/was running fine partaking in a Windows 2000 domain. I needed to reboot the server. It has come up and I am getting "input/output errors" all over the logs when I try and access any of the shares on the raid array from a Windows client

..._ctx(281) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2002/07/09 10:16:07, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(283) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2002/07/09 10:16:07, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(313) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2002/07/09 10:16:07, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(162) get_current_groups: user is in 2 groups: 1000, 201 [2002/07/09 10:16:07, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(420) pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2002/07/09 10:16:07, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(162) get_current_groups: user is in 2 groups: 1000, 201 [2002/07/09 10:16:07,...

..._ctx(297) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2003/01/07 17:42:53, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(286) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/01/07 17:42:53, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2003/01/07 17:42:53, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(172) get_current_groups: user is in 3 groups: 1000, 1000, 0 [2003/01/07 17:42:53, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(436) pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/01/07 17:42:53, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(172) get_current_groups: user is in 3 groups: 1000, 1000, 0 [2003/01/07 1...

...sec_ctx(282) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2003/10/18 11:08:40, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(285) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/10/18 11:08:40, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(314) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2003/10/18 11:08:40, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(162) get_current_groups: user is in 2 groups: 1000, 108 [2003/10/18 11:08:40, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(421) pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/10/18 11:08:40, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(162) get_current_groups: user is in 2 groups: 1000, 108 [2003/10/18 11:08:40, 10...

..._ctx(297) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2002/11/22 09:23:24, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(286) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2002/11/22 09:23:24, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2002/11/22 09:23:24, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(172) get_current_groups: user is in 10 groups: 100, 0, 6, 8, 9, 14, 16, 17, 31, 33 [2002/11/22 09:23:24, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(436) pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2002/11/22 09:23:24, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(172) get_current_groups: user is in 10 groups: 100...

..._ctx(281) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2002/08/19 10:22:53, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(285) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2002/08/19 10:22:53, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(313) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2002/08/19 10:22:53, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(162) get_current_groups: user is in 1 groups: 99 Thank you. Tony McGrew WWW.Multicam.com

..._ctx(282) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2002/08/22 09:02:23, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(286) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2002/08/22 09:02:23, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(314) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2002/08/22 09:02:23, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(162) get_current_groups: user is in 1 groups: 60001 [2002/08/22 09:02:23, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(421) pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2002/08/22 09:02:23, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(162) get_current_groups: user is in 1 groups: 60001 [2002/08/22 09:02:23, 3] smbd...

...load_ex) pm_process() returned Yes [2015/01/07 23:08:32, 7, pid=36241414, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] ../source3/param/loadparm.c:5168(lp_servicenumber) lp_servicenumber: couldn't find homes [2015/01/07 23:08:32, 4, pid=36241414, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] ../source3/smbd/sec_ctx.c:176(get_current_groups) get_current_groups: user is in 7 groups: 0, 2, 3, 7, 8, 10, 11 [2015/01/07 23:08:32, 5, pid=36241414, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] ../source3/lib/messages.c:293(messaging_register) Registering messaging pointer for type 2 - private_data=0 [2015/01/07 23:08:32, 5, pid=36241414, effective(0,...

..._ctx(297) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2003/09/18 10:21:28, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(286) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/09/18 10:21:28, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2003/09/18 10:21:28, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(172) get_current_groups: user is in 2 groups: 65533, 65534 [2003/09/18 10:21:28, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(436) pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/09/18 10:21:28, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(172) get_current_groups: user is in 2 groups: 65533, 65534 [2003/09/18 10:...

Hello, I have recently installed Samba 3.0.2 on Solaris 8. All is OK except for Windows NT. I can't open the user's shares on the Samba box. I get : D:\ n'est pas accessible Erreur reseau inattendue (Unexpected network error) I have already set encrypt passwords = No unicode = No in smb.conf and the corresponding register key on NT I have a level 3

...make_connection(477) Connect path is /samba/mp3z [2001/12/14 04:26:51, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(288) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2001/12/14 04:26:51, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(320) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2001/12/14 04:26:51, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(167) get_current_groups: uid 0 is in 7 groups: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10 [2001/12/14 04:26:51, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(427) pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2001/12/14 04:26:51, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(167) get_current_groups: uid 0 is in 7 groups: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6,...

..._ctx(297) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2003/01/07 16:23:19, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(286) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/01/07 16:23:19, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2003/01/07 16:23:19, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(172) get_current_groups: user is in 7 groups: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10 [2003/01/07 16:23:19, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(436) pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/01/07 16:23:19, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(172) get_current_groups: user is in 7 groups: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10...

..._ctx(256) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2005/11/27 12:05:54, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(388) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2005/11/27 12:05:54, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2005/11/27 12:05:54, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(171) get_current_groups: user is in 1 groups: 65534 [2005/11/27 12:05:54, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(386) pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2005/11/27 12:05:54, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(171) get_current_groups: user is in 1 groups: 65534 [2005/11/27 12:05:54, 3] smbd...

I've to migrate a NT4 PDC to an samba PDC (running samba 3.0.0beta2 on a debian/GNU/linux box). Samba is already setup and working as a BDC. When I try to perform: net rpc vampire -S PDC all existing userSIDs are put into samba's 'passwd.tdb'. The problem is now, how to get a working userSID <-> UID mapping: The existing userSID have RID parts in the range of

...81) push_sec_ctx(544, 544) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2002/06/27 20:06:49, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(285) push_conn_ctx(100) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2002/06/27 20:06:49, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(313) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2002/06/27 20:06:49, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(162) get_current_groups: user is in 4 groups: 544, 100, 506, 598 [2002/06/27 20:06:49, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(420) pop_sec_ctx (544, 544) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2002/06/27 20:06:49, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(162) get_current_groups: user is in 4 groups: 544, 100, 506, 598...

..._ctx(297) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2002/10/05 21:50:27, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(286) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2002/10/05 21:50:27, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2002/10/05 21:50:27, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(172) get_current_groups: user is in 3 groups: 1001, 1001, 0 [2002/10/05 21:50:27, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(436) pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2002/10/05 21:50:27, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(172) get_current_groups: user is in 3 groups: 1001, 1001, 0 [2002/10/05 2...

...c_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2005/04/23 08:51:32, 5] auth/auth_util.c:debug_nt_user_token(486) NT user token: (NULL) [2005/04/23 08:51:32, 5] auth/auth_util.c:debug_unix_user_token(505) UNIX token of user 0 Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups [2005/04/23 08:51:32, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(171) get_current_groups: user is in 2 groups: 0, 512 [2005/04/23 08:51:32, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(386) pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2005/04/23 08:51:32, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(171) get_current_groups: user is in 2 groups: 0, 512 [2005/04/23 08:51:32, 3] sm...

John, thanks for that hint. It did not kill the server by you are perfectly right. I changed this and restarted the "smb" and "nmb" deamons - unfortunately with the same result. When I watch e.g. the status with "swat" I see as follows after trying with: smbclient -U <user> -L win2k1 (what is strange since I connect as different user and not

Desperate to find out why connecting to a samba share(on an AIX server) from W2K is so slow, I tried connecting to the same share from a Linux box, using smbclient: smbclient \\\\aixserver\\sharedir$ -U lynn The results were amazing. The connection was so MUCH FASTER then connecting from a W2K (pro) workstation: \\aixserver\sharedir$ (in the Start|Run edit box) When I examined the samba log