search for: get_complex

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "get_complex".

Did you mean: est_complex
2006 Aug 22
2
Please test upcoming release
...t" is 16 bits. > > The types in the state structure and the _ctl routines really should > match. For now, I have changed testenc-TI-C5x.c to pass a 32-bit > parameter, which works with no change elsewhere. I can send a patch for > this. > > Another inconsistency is that GET_COMPLEXITY returns a spx_int32_t, but > the field st->complexity is an int. > > - Jim > > _______________________________________________ > Speex-dev mailing list > Speex-dev@xiph.org > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev >
2006 Aug 17
7
Please test upcoming release
Hi everyone, I'm about to release version 1.2-beta1 (which I could have called 1.1.13), which includes many, many changes. It would help if everyone could give the svn version (http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/speex/) a try and see if it works fine. I'll check my email next week when I'm back from some vacations and if nothing bad has been reported, I'll make the release. Have fun,
2006 Aug 23
0
Please test upcoming release
...t; >> The types in the state structure and the _ctl routines really should >> match. For now, I have changed testenc-TI-C5x.c to pass a 32-bit >> parameter, which works with no change elsewhere. I can send a patch for >> this. >> >> Another inconsistency is that GET_COMPLEXITY returns a spx_int32_t, but >> the field st->complexity is an int. >> >> - Jim >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Speex-dev mailing list >> Speex-dev@xiph.org >> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev >> >...