search for: get_anc

...ell known one. The trouble is, Samba 4.4 was happy to get a tree like this: X | | Y Z in an order like this: Step 1 Y Step 2 Y Z Step 3 X | | Y Z As long as everything worked out in the end, it was fine. But this had issues, so we patched it to instead demand the objects in tree order (GET_ANC), but of course the server needs to know what that means. Samba 4.5 was, from memory, the first release we did that, but the server, even with 4.4, didn't really know what that flag meant. It wasn't until much later, Samba 4.6 or so, when we finally got the flag right, which of course...

...Z > > in an order like this: > > Step 1 > > Y > > Step 2 > > Y Z > > Step 3 > X > | | > Y Z > > As long as everything worked out in the end, it was fine. But this had > issues, so we patched it to instead demand the objects in tree order > (GET_ANC), but of course the server needs to know what that means. > > Samba 4.5 was, from memory, the first release we did that, but the > server, even with 4.4, didn't really know what that flag meant. > > It wasn't until much later, Samba 4.6 or so, when we finally got the > fla...

...Y Z > > > > > > Step 3 > > > X > > > | | > > > Y Z > > > > > > As long as everything worked out in the end, it was fine. But this had > > > issues, so we patched it to instead demand the objects in tree order > > > (GET_ANC), but of course the server needs to know what that means. > > > > > > Samba 4.5 was, from memory, the first release we did that, but the > > > server, even with 4.4, didn't really know what that flag meant. > > > > > > It wasn't until much later,...

...ell known one. The trouble is, Samba 4.4 was happy to get a tree like this: X | | Y Z in an order like this: Step 1 Y Step 2 Y Z Step 3 X | | Y Z As long as everything worked out in the end, it was fine. But this had issues, so we patched it to instead demand the objects in tree order (GET_ANC), but of course the server needs to know what that means. Samba 4.5 was, from memory, the first release we did that, but the server, even with 4.4, didn't really know what that flag meant. It wasn't until much later, Samba 4.6 or so, when we finally got the flag right, which of course giv...

...gt; > > > Step 2 > > > > Y Z > > > > Step 3 > > X > > | | > > Y Z > > > > As long as everything worked out in the end, it was fine. But this had > > issues, so we patched it to instead demand the objects in tree order > > (GET_ANC), but of course the server needs to know what that means. > > > > Samba 4.5 was, from memory, the first release we did that, but the > > server, even with 4.4, didn't really know what that flag meant. > > > > It wasn't until much later, Samba 4.6 or so, when we...

...ream never completes. ?? * BUG 15195: Permission denied calling SMBC_getatr when file not exists. o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> ?? * BUG 15189: Samba 4.5 sometimes cannot be upgraded to Samba 4.6 or later ???? over DRS: WERROR_DS_DRA_MISSING_PARENT due to faulty GET_ANC. ?? * BUG 15191: pytest: add file removal helpers for TestCaseInTempDir. o? Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> ?? * BUG 14611: CVE-2021-20251 [SECURITY] Bad password count not incremented ???? atomically. ?? * BUG 15189: Samba 4.5 sometimes cannot be upgraded to Samba 4.6 or later...

...ream never completes. ?? * BUG 15195: Permission denied calling SMBC_getatr when file not exists. o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> ?? * BUG 15189: Samba 4.5 sometimes cannot be upgraded to Samba 4.6 or later ???? over DRS: WERROR_DS_DRA_MISSING_PARENT due to faulty GET_ANC. ?? * BUG 15191: pytest: add file removal helpers for TestCaseInTempDir. o? Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> ?? * BUG 14611: CVE-2021-20251 [SECURITY] Bad password count not incremented ???? atomically. ?? * BUG 15189: Samba 4.5 sometimes cannot be upgraded to Samba 4.6 or later...

...; > > > > > > Y Z > > > > > > > > As long as everything worked out in the end, it was fine. But > > > > this had > > > > issues, so we patched it to instead demand the objects in tree > > > > order > > > > (GET_ANC), but of course the server needs to know what that > > > > means. > > > > > > > > Samba 4.5 was, from memory, the first release we did that, but > > > > the > > > > server, even with 4.4, didn't really know what that flag meant. >...

...replicated objects: WERR_DS_DRA_MISSING_PARENT") > > Thanks, this gives us the information we need. > > What has happened here is that Samba 4.1, indeed all Samba versions > sort the returned results by the order of last change. However, before > 4.4 did not know about the GET_ANC flag, to sort the results tree-wise, > which we need in this situation, so we can find the parent objects > before we replicate the children. > > This means that, to replicate from Samba 4.1, you need to carefully > change a unimportant attribute in all the child objects of OU=Kerbe...

Good evening! I am having difficulty joining a Samba4 install to my current domain. A little background, our DC1 box got blown away when we had a disk failure on our VM server. We had a backup, but it was old and basically unusable. I am trying to build a new DC1 and join it to the same domain as DC2 My current DC is DC2, it is a TKL Samba4 box running Samba 4.5.12-Debian. I upgraded it's

Hello everyone, i try to use Samba RODC(4.6.5) with W2K8R2. Windows AD has around 35000 objects. My Samba machine is small one (ARM 32bit CPU) with only 2GB physical memory, so i can’t join to the domain because of expensive memory usage. To solve this Problem, i decide to replicate only critical objects and then let samba_kcc to get other objects. 1 ) Is this an possible way to use Samba AD or

----- On May 24, 2020, at 11:30 PM, samba samba at lists.samba.org wrote: > On Sun, 2020-05-24 at 23:01 -0400, Rich Webb via samba wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm attempting to join a new samba 4 server version 4.12.3 to an >> existing samba 4 domain running on Zentyal 3.2 (samba version >> 4.1.7). >> >> I'm getting the error in the subject line:

...s > 'chunk' of DRS replicated objects: WERR_DS_DRA_MISSING_PARENT") Thanks, this gives us the information we need. What has happened here is that Samba 4.1, indeed all Samba versions sort the returned results by the order of last change. However, before 4.4 did not know about the GET_ANC flag, to sort the results tree-wise, which we need in this situation, so we can find the parent objects before we replicate the children. This means that, to replicate from Samba 4.1, you need to carefully change a unimportant attribute in all the child objects of OU=Kerberos 'later' than...

...PARENT") > > > > Thanks, this gives us the information we need. > > > > What has happened here is that Samba 4.1, indeed all Samba versions > > sort the returned results by the order of last change. However, > > before > > 4.4 did not know about the GET_ANC flag, to sort the results tree- > > wise, > > which we need in this situation, so we can find the parent objects > > before we replicate the children. > > > > This means that, to replicate from Samba 4.1, you need to carefully > > change a unimportant attribute...

..., 2017-12-11 at 19:56 -0600, Taylor Hammerling via samba wrote: > > Good evening! > > > > I am having difficulty joining a Samba4 install to my current domain. > > What new version are you running? Samba 4.6 or 4.7 should work better > for this (support for a flag called GET_ANC), but the issue is server- > side so you may have to upgrade the server first. > > Andrew Bartlett > > -- > Andrew Bartlett > https://samba.org/~abartlet/ > Authentication Developer, Samba Team https://samba.org > Samba Development and Support, Catalyst IT > ht...

hello our AD domain is hosted by two samba AD domain controllers version 4.12.6 - replication between controllers is fine, no problems. - no schema errors. - no database errors, all fine. - no CPU utilizations - wthout noticeable bandwidth utilization Recently we have deployed Azure AD connector on dedicated windows system (system is domain member server). since this deployment we are observing

...") >>> Thanks, this gives us the information we need. >>> >>> What has happened here is that Samba 4.1, indeed all Samba versions >>> sort the returned results by the order of last change. However, >>> before >>> 4.4 did not know about the GET_ANC flag, to sort the results tree- >>> wise, >>> which we need in this situation, so we can find the parent objects >>> before we replicate the children. >>> >>> This means that, to replicate from Samba 4.1, you need to carefully >>> change a unimp...

Hi, After reading wiki documentation about join I have tested to join a second dc, but with problems. I need to add a second controller to our AD, and then upgrade existing server (4.4.5) and I have tried to join a new DC 4.10.7 to 4.4.5 server but I receive join errors, attached output wit and without debug: I have executed samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs all seems OK I have made a test