search for: geryon

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "geryon".

Did you mean: gerion
2009 May 05
2
[LLVMdev] [PATH] Fixes for the amd64 JIT code
Hi Zoltan, The part that determines whether SIB byte is needed caused a lot of regressions last night (see Geryon-X86-64 etc.). I've reverted it for now. Please take a look. Thanks, Evan On May 4, 2009, at 3:49 PM, Evan Cheng wrote: > Committed as revision 70929. Thanks. > > Evan > > On May 3, 2009, at 8:29 PM, vargaz wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> If this looks ok...
2009 May 05
0
[LLVMdev] [PATH] Fixes for the amd64 JIT code
...atter, since it checks for ESP/EBP which is the same as R12/R13. Zoltan On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Zoltan, > > The part that determines whether SIB byte is needed caused a lot of > regressions last night (see Geryon-X86-64 etc.). I've reverted it for > now. Please take a look. > > Thanks, > > Evan > > On May 4, 2009, at 3:49 PM, Evan Cheng wrote: > > > Committed as revision 70929. Thanks. > > > > Evan > > > > On May 3, 2009, at 8:29 PM, vargaz wrote: &g...
2009 May 05
1
[LLVMdev] [PATH] Fixes for the amd64 JIT code
...the same as R12/R13. > > Zoltan > > > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: > >> Hi Zoltan, >> >> The part that determines whether SIB byte is needed caused a lot of >> regressions last night (see Geryon-X86-64 etc.). I've reverted it for >> now. Please take a look. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Evan >> >> On May 4, 2009, at 3:49 PM, Evan Cheng wrote: >> >> > Committed as revision 70929. Thanks. >> > >> > Evan >> > >&g...
2009 May 04
0
[LLVMdev] [PATH] Fixes for the amd64 JIT code
Committed as revision 70929. Thanks. Evan On May 3, 2009, at 8:29 PM, vargaz wrote: > > Hi, > > If this looks ok, could somebody check it in ? > > thanks > > Zoltan > > > Evan Cheng-2 wrote: >> >> Looks good. Thanks. >> >> Evan >> >> On May 1, 2009, at 8:40 AM, Zoltan Varga wrote: >>
2009 May 04
3
[LLVMdev] [PATH] Fixes for the amd64 JIT code
Hi, If this looks ok, could somebody check it in ? thanks Zoltan Evan Cheng-2 wrote: > > Looks good. Thanks. > > Evan > > On May 1, 2009, at 8:40 AM, Zoltan Varga wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The attached patch contains the following changes: >> >> * X86InstrInfo.cpp: Synchronize a few places with the code