search for: gersdorff

Guus Sliepen [2016-05-24 11:26 +0200] : > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:17:07AM +0200, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote: [...] > > A $ cat /usr/local/etc/tinc/klaas/tinc-up > > ifconfig $INTERFACE inet6 fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1:0:1 prefixlen 80 > > route -6 add -host fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:2:0:1 fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1:0:1 > > route -6 add -net fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:2::/96 fd16:dcc0...

* Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff <niklaas at kulturflatrate.net>: > On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:43:16 +0300 > Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > > > I've been once in a while over the years thinking about implementing > > CalDAV (and CardDAV) to Dovecot. It might be time to start that soon. &gt...

Hello, I already consulted related lists @freebsd.org [1,2] but I have remained unsuccessful to solve the following issue: VPN works for an internal IPv4 subnet, but I doesn't for an internal IPv6 subnet with ULAs. To be honest, I don't have any experience setting up a local IPv6; so I guess that I'm doing something wrong here. For those that know FreeBSD: The main aim is to connect

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:17:07AM +0200, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote: > I want to serve IPv4 subnets 10.1.0.0/16 (machine A) and 10.2.0.0/16 > (machine B), and IPv6 subnets fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1::/96 (machine A) and > fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:2::/96 (machine B) respectively. The jails are > connected on lo1. [...] > A $ cat /usr/local/etc/tinc/kla...

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:08:38PM +0200, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote: > So, when I try to `ping6 fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:2:1:1` `tinc -D -d5` gives > me the following output: > > Cannot route packet: neighbor solicitation request for unknown address fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:2:1:1 This means that either tinc is not connected to B, or that B does not ha...

I've been once in a while over the years thinking about implementing CalDAV (and CardDAV) to Dovecot. It might be time to start that soon. Does anyone have any suggestions? So far my main goals would be: - scalable, of course - configurable storage (object storage, regular fs, maybe some key-value dbs, maybe storing as emails) - efficient indexes (potentially using key-value dbs? or maybe

On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:43:16 +0300 Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > I've been once in a while over the years thinking about implementing > CalDAV (and CardDAV) to Dovecot. It might be time to start that soon. > Does anyone have any suggestions? So far my main goals would be: > > - scalable, of course > - configurable storage (object storage, regular fs, maybe

sthaug at nethelp.no [2016-05-27 08:53 +0200] : > I don't see any problem using ULA with for instance /124 netmask: [...] > 96 bit works too: [...] FreeBSD version? Mine is 10.3-RELEASE-p3. Dunno. Could be that I made some mistake but I also tried the setup with /96 and adding the route to the tap0 interface and it did not work. Niklaas -------------- next part -------------- A

Kevin Oberman [2016-05-27 12:02 -0700] : > This is fine, but why not use link-local for the VPN links? That's the > primary reason for them. (N.B. I am not aware of your architectural > details, and ULAs for the VPNs might be appropriate.) Is it? I didn't know that I can use link-local addresses for the VPN too. How do I decide between link-local or unique-local addresses for

Mark Tinka [2016-05-27 23:57 +0200] : > On 27/May/16 21:02, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > This is fine, but why not use link-local for the VPN links? That's > > the primary reason for them. > > That's really not good advice. > > I'd caution against using link-local addresses for any type of > service. > > Link-local addresses are used for

Mark Tinka [2016-05-28 14:11 +0200] : > Why don't you have GUA IPv6 address space? > > Your ISP should be able to assign you a /48 or /56 prefix for you to > use on your LAN. That's more than plenty of space. As I wrote, I only got a /112 form my ISP. This still exceeds the amount of addresses that I need but I decided to go for ULAs for flexibility. Anyway, it's