search for: gerdt

samba@samba.org Jeremy Allison <jeremy@valinux.com> Jeremy Allison <jeremy@valinux.com> "Deborah Barba" <dbarba@yahoo-inc.com> Jeremy Allison <jeremy@valinux.com> "Michael Martin" <michael@violetstar.com> Michael Gerdts <gerdts@cae.wisc.edu> Sachin Patil (C&A_Projects) <cna-sp@asc.ltindia.com> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@samba.org> "Sander Striker" <s.striker@striker.nl> Giulio Orsero <giulioo@pobox.com> Giulio Orsero <giulioo@pobox.com> Giulio...

Hi gurus, I like zpool iostat and I like system monitoring, so I setup a script within sma to let me get the zpool iostat figures through snmp. The problem is that as zpool iostat is only run once for each snmp query, it always reports a static set of figures, like so: root at exodus:snmp # zpool iostat -v capacity operations bandwidth pool used avail read

...been done to identify the performance characteristics in this area? Is there less to be concerned about from a performance standpoint if the workload is primarily read? To maximize the efficacy of dedup, would it be best to pick a fixed block size and match it between the layers of zfs? -- Mike Gerdts http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 Michael.Gerdts at med.ge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|Michael.Gerdts at alcatel.com |Michael.Gerdts at med.ge.com ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You...

...nt when the system reboots. This pro- perty can also be referred to by its shortened column name, "temp". > (I am trying to move this thread over to zfs-discuss, since I originally > posted to the wrong alias) storage-discuss trimmed in my reply. -- Mike Gerdts http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212 ------- Additional Comments From Michael.Gerdts at alcatel.com 2002-04-11 00:33 ------- This patch also changes the behavior of ssh-keyscan when a hostname does not resolve. I have changed the condition from fatal() to error() so that the scan does not quit when it runs across a bad hostname. ------- You are receiving this mail because:...

...orporated all of the feedback given (thanks!). Changes since the 2008-11-16 version include: - ksh style & coding standards compliance in test script (Roland) - "dof_init_debug == B_FALSE" vs. "!dof_init_debug" (Adam) The updated webrev is at: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~mgerdts/6750659-2008-12-03/ -- Mike Gerdts http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/

...velopers to allow the file system to tell the storage array "this range of blocks is unused" so that the array can reclaim the space? I could see this as useful when doing re-writes of data (e.g. crypto rekey) to concentrate data that had become scattered into contiguous space. -- Mike Gerdts http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/

A moderately-frequently asked question is "why do automounted directories in shares disappear?" The old answers were: 1) they timed out and auto-un-mounted, and 2) you shouldn't re-export NFS-imported stuff anyway. A new answer (0) was just suggested by a Sun techie: add a "browse" option to the automounter map entry, to make them appear even when they're not

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 Michael.Gerdts at alcatel.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Michael.Gerdts at alcatel.com ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You...

...-d -c /var/tmp/thursday.snap.gz | zfs receive -F pool/thursday === End quote === There have been several threads on this list saying not to do that. It seems that this guide aimed at new users is inviting people to do things that will lead them to unsympathetic ears if things go poorly. -- Mike Gerdts http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/

...unctionality would come in very handy. It would seem that it isn''t too big of a deal to identify the files that changed, as this type of data is already presented via "zpool status -v" when corruption is detected. http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-5461/gbctx?a=view -- Mike Gerdts http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/

Hi Everyone ; I will soon be making a presentation comparing ZFS against Veritas Storage Foundation , do we have any document comparing features ? regards <http://www.sun.com/> http://www.sun.com/emrkt/sigs/6g_top.gif Mertol Ozyoney Storage Practice - Sales Manager Sun Microsystems, TR Istanbul TR Phone +902123352200 Mobile +905339310752 Fax +902123352222 Email

I am pretty new to Dtrace but use the Dtrace Toolkit when trying to troubleshoot I/O issues On Oracle. I am looking for help on how to do the following: I am trying to answer whether adding more HBA Cards/ports would be effective. To do this, I need to know the i/o''s per second As well as total bandwidth per second. Has anyone done this before? Does anyone have any other ideas on how

I wanted to send out status on the effort to make a version of Solaris install available that supports zfs as a root file system. I''ve got a version of it ready for distribution, but I''d like to test it on the Build 62 community release before I make it available. Without the build 62 community release, I have to test it on a build 61 image, updated with some build 62 packages.

Deduplication was committed last night by Mr. Bonwick: > Log message: > PSARC 2009/571 ZFS Deduplication Properties > 6677093 zfs should have dedup capability http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/onnv-notify/2009-November/010683.html Via c0t0d0s0.org.

All, I have been working on a component that is included with samba called SMBSH. The binary allows you to automount your NT shares by accessing your profile . I have been working on this for the last few days and have been unsuccesful at getting it work. Now I am not much of a programmer, but I did my best to try and troubleshoot this. However it just does not want to work in Linux. I

Is there any update/work-around/patch/etc as of the S10u4 WOS for the bugs that existed with respect to LU, Zones, and ZFS? More specifically, the following: 6359924 live upgrade needs to include support for zfs I can''t even find that bug ID on bugs.opensolaris.org (or via sunsolve when I''m logged in for that matter) anymore. Basically, one couldn''t put zoneroot on

Does anybody know if native block level replication or block level ?de-duplication? as NetApp calls it will be added? This message posted from opensolaris.org

Today, I ran a scrub on my rootFS pool. I received the following lovely output: # zpool status larger_root ? pool: larger_root ?state: ONLINE ?scrub: scrub completed after 307445734561825856h29m with 0 errors on Wed Jul 15 21:49:02 2009 config: ??????? NAME??????? STATE???? READ WRITE CKSUM ??????? larger_root? ONLINE?????? 0???? 0???? 0 ????????? c4t1d0s0? ONLINE?????? 0???? 0???? 0 errors: No