search for: geoknife

...//www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#license-specification, which does not explicitly include Unlicense, but does include CC0, which AFAICT is meant to formally license something so that it is equivalent to being in the public domain. R does include CC0 as a shorthand (e.g., geoknife). https://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/ says that <quote> Licenses currently found in Debian main include: - ... - ... - public domain (not a license, strictly speaking) </quote> The equivalent for CRAN would probably be something like "License: public-domain + file LICENSE&...

...ls/copyright-format/1.0/#license-specification, >> which does not explicitly include Unlicense, but does include CC0, >> which AFAICT is meant to formally license something so that it is >> equivalent to being in the public domain. R does include CC0 as a >> shorthand (e.g., geoknife). >> >> https://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/ says that >> >> <quote> >> >> Licenses currently found in Debian main include: >> >> - ... >> - ... >> - public domain (not a license, strictly speaking) >> >> </quote>...

...-specification, >>>> which does not explicitly include Unlicense, but does include CC0, >>>> which AFAICT is meant to formally license something so that it is >>>> equivalent to being in the public domain. R does include CC0 as a >>>> shorthand (e.g., geoknife). >>>> >>>> https://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/ says that >>>> >>>> <quote> >>>> >>>> Licenses currently found in Debian main include: >>>> >>>> - ... >>>> - ... >>>> - p...

.../packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#license-specification, > which does not explicitly include Unlicense, but does include CC0, > which AFAICT is meant to formally license something so that it is > equivalent to being in the public domain. R does include CC0 as a > shorthand (e.g., geoknife). > > https://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/ says that > > <quote> > > Licenses currently found in Debian main include: > > - ... > - ... > - public domain (not a license, strictly speaking) > > </quote> > > The equivalent for CRAN would probabl...

...mat/1.0/#license-specification, >>> which does not explicitly include Unlicense, but does include CC0, >>> which AFAICT is meant to formally license something so that it is >>> equivalent to being in the public domain. R does include CC0 as a >>> shorthand (e.g., geoknife). >>> >>> https://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/ says that >>> >>> <quote> >>> >>> Licenses currently found in Debian main include: >>> >>> - ... >>> - ... >>> - public domain (not a license, strictly sp...

I would like the unlicense (http://unlicense.org/) added to R licenses. Does anyone else think that worthwhile? -- Charles Geyer Professor, School of Statistics Resident Fellow, Minnesota Center for Philosophy of Science University of Minnesota charlie at stat.umn.edu

...>>>> which does not explicitly include Unlicense, but does include CC0, > >>>> which AFAICT is meant to formally license something so that it is > >>>> equivalent to being in the public domain. R does include CC0 as a > >>>> shorthand (e.g., geoknife). > >>>> > >>>> https://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/ says that > >>>> > >>>> <quote> > >>>> > >>>> Licenses currently found in Debian main include: > >>>> > >>>> - ... &gt...