search for: genrad

...e results on Linux versions: the 1.9.xx versions work; the 2.0.x versions ignore the port specification. This appears to be a bug, rather than an out-of-date man page or a misunderstanding on my part, though if it's the latter, that's much easier to fix. :-) pete peterson GenRad, Inc. 7 Technology Park Drive Westford, MA 01886-0033 petersonp@genrad.com or rep@genrad.com +1-978-589-7478 (GenRad); +1-978-256-5829 (Home: Chelmsford, MA) +1-978-589-2088 (Closest FAX); +1-978-589-7007 (Main GenRad FAX)

...the messages below. The smb_proc_readdir_long messages are definitely smbfs messages, since they're referring to items on the Micro$oft system. Can anyone explain these messages and suggest what might be causing this problem? Any insight would be appreciated. pete peterson GenRad, Inc. 7 Technology Park Drive Westford, MA 01886-0033 petersonp@genrad.com or rep@genrad.com +1-978-589-7478 (GenRad); +1-978-256-5829 (Home: Chelmsford, MA) +1-978-589-2088 (Closest FAX); +1-978-589-7007 (Main GenRad FAX) *******************************...

...message, ending it with a Control-D sent 34 bytes (status was 0-0) -------------------- Is this a bug in Samba, a bug in the man page, or some kind of misunderstanding on my part? The man page still proclaims the existence of the "-p <port>" option. pete peterson GenRad, Inc. 7 Technology Park Drive Westford, MA 01886-0033 petersonp@genrad.com or rep@genrad.com +1-978-589-7478 (GenRad); +1-978-256-5829 (Home: Chelmsford, MA) +1-978-589-2088 (Closest FAX); +1-978-589-7007 (Main GenRad FAX)

...date is being passed from the client. But that doesn't explain > why the original code works, and the patched code doesn't > > This is extremely reproducable. If someone would like for me to send > detailed log files, I'd be happy to do so. > > - john nelson (jpn@genrad.com) >

...t need to remember how to manipulate source RPMs so I can fix the Linux (RedHat 6.x) version. :-) pete > From peter@cadcamlab.org Sun Jul 16 16:41:17 2000 > Cc: <samba@samba.org> > Subject: [PATCH] `smbclient -M' ignores `-p port' > > [Pete Peterson <petersonp@genrad.com>] > > It appears that "smbclient -p <portnumber>" doesn't work as > > advertised in Samba 2.x. > > It does work, just not for winpopup messages. (: This patch should fix > it. It's untested but almost certainly correct. > > Samba maintai...

John, Thank you very much! >>>> John P. Nelson <nelsonjp@genrad.com> 01/08/04 03:43PM >>> >>an on Solaris 8, the 'configure' step completes >>successfully, but 'make' seems to hang early: >> ... >>creating /home/troy/src/samba/samba-3.0.1/source/include/proto.h >>[it hangs here for hours if I let it] &g...

I am yet another person who is having a problem with Win98 clients needing to make several attempts before successfully logging in to our Samba box. I get the "broken pipe" message in the smb.log just like everyone else. This did not seem to be a problem until we got a phat broadband connection. All the Windows boxes are set to point to our ISP's DNS. I am not running DNS on the

...AMPANHA DA FITA ASCII - CONTRA MAIL HTML > X ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN - AGAINST HTML MAIL > / \ > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 11:09:16 -0500 > From: Hongwei Li <hongwei@morpheus.wustl.edu> > To: "Nelson, John P." <NelsonJP@genrad.com>, "samba@samba.org" <samba@samba.org> > Subject: Re: An even more strange win95 browsing problem > Message-ID: <3728842C.2DBDE70E@morpheus.wustl.edu> > > Hi John, > > Thank you very much for your help. I tested on about ten Windows 95 and some >...

...not installed). I also reviewed the fix list for SP 5, 6, and 6a, and it didn't seem to mention anything relevant. Thanks for any info! /jmd -- Jeremy M. Dolan <my-three-initials@pobox.com> PGP: 1024D/DC433DEE 494C 7A6E 19FB 026A 1F52 E0D5 5C5D 6228 DC43 3DEE Return-Path: <jpn@ns1.genrad.com> Delivered-To: samba@samba.org Received: from ns1.genrad.com (ns1.genrad.com [132.223.4.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E165021 for <samba@samba.org>; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 14:38:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aurora.genrad.com (aurora [132.223.4.126]) by ns1.genrad.co...

Does Samba allow me to mount NT (disks) file systems on my Unix (SGI) box? Randy -- Randy Fox Coryphaeus Software, Inc. Sr. Software Engineer 985 University Ave. Suite 31 rfox@coryphaeus.com Los Gatos CA, 95030 www.coryphaeus.com Tel: 408/395-4537 Fax: 408/395-6351

...happens if ppp0 goes DOWN, and then comes back up with a different IP address and subnet? Please help :) thanks, Tim Carr _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Return-Path: <jpn@ns1.genrad.com> Delivered-To: samba@samba.org Received: from ns1.genrad.com (ns1.genrad.com [132.223.4.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28197511F for <samba@samba.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:52:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aurora.genrad.com (aurora [132.223.4.126]) by ns1.genrad.co...

.... (I had to log off and log on again to the Win98 machine to see the previously missing files.) Thanks for the help. Note that I introduced the "nt smb support = no" to solve the same problem described in "2.0.6: file timestamps acting strange - even with patch." by NelsonJP@genrad.com on 2000-03-10. I'll try running Samba 2.2.0 to see if this timestamp problem has gone away, in which case the "nt smb support = no" line will not be needed. The presence or not of the "nt smb support = no" line in my samba-1.9.18p4-sunos5.6 conf file seems to have no...

I just installed 2.0.7pre2 on a test system. The file "touch" problem from 2.0.6 seems to be back. Running various utilities called "touch" do not successfully update file timestamps on a filesystem provided by 2.0.7pre2. I actually prefer THIS incorrect behavior over the behavior I've seen after this bug is "fixed". The bugfix posted by Paul Eggert for 2.0.6

Recently, we've noticed that our Samba servers were no longer registered on our NT-based WINS server. The WINS entries for the samba servers simply expired and were not renewed. Restarting samba renewed the Wins name registration. We have multiple subnets or we wouldn't have noticed the problem: PCs on the same subnet as the Samba server were still finding the server via broadcast name

I've just compiled Samba 3.0.0 on a Solaris 8 system (gcc, if it matters), and whenever I run anything from the samba suite, I get a series of error message about character set conversions: Conversion from UCS-2LE to CP850 not supported Conversion from UTF8 to CP850 not supported ... and about 10 more, all involving CP850 (the "standard" DOS codepage, presumably). Now,

PLEASE, PLEASE DELETE ME OFF THE MAILING LIST. I HAVE SENT SEVERAL MESSAGES REGARDING THIS!!! THANK YOU -----Original Message----- From: samba@samba.anu.edu.au [SMTP:samba@samba.anu.edu.au] Sent: Thursday, August 13, 1998 1:09 PM To: Multiple recipients of list Subject: SAMBA digest 1778 SAMBA Digest 1778 For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.anu.edu.au/listproc