search for: genetlink

...ly a completely stupid idea, but if we need to >start marshalling configuration requests/hints maybe the entire problem >could be solved by opening a netlink socket from hypervisor? Even make >teamd run on the hypervisor side... Interesting. That would be more trickier then just to fwd 1 genetlink socket to the hypervisor. Also, I think that the solution should handle multiple guest oses. What I'm thinking about is some generic bonding description passed over some communication channel into vm. The vm either use it for configuration, or ignores it if it is not smart enough/updated enoug...

...ly a completely stupid idea, but if we need to >start marshalling configuration requests/hints maybe the entire problem >could be solved by opening a netlink socket from hypervisor? Even make >teamd run on the hypervisor side... Interesting. That would be more trickier then just to fwd 1 genetlink socket to the hypervisor. Also, I think that the solution should handle multiple guest oses. What I'm thinking about is some generic bonding description passed over some communication channel into vm. The vm either use it for configuration, or ignores it if it is not smart enough/updated enoug...

...o >> >start marshalling configuration requests/hints maybe the entire problem >> >could be solved by opening a netlink socket from hypervisor? Even make >> >teamd run on the hypervisor side... >> >> Interesting. That would be more trickier then just to fwd 1 genetlink >> socket to the hypervisor. >> >> Also, I think that the solution should handle multiple guest oses. What >> I'm thinking about is some generic bonding description passed over some >> communication channel into vm. The vm either use it for configuration, >>...

...o >> >start marshalling configuration requests/hints maybe the entire problem >> >could be solved by opening a netlink socket from hypervisor? Even make >> >teamd run on the hypervisor side... >> >> Interesting. That would be more trickier then just to fwd 1 genetlink >> socket to the hypervisor. >> >> Also, I think that the solution should handle multiple guest oses. What >> I'm thinking about is some generic bonding description passed over some >> communication channel into vm. The vm either use it for configuration, >>...

...figuration requests/hints maybe the entire problem >> >> >could be solved by opening a netlink socket from hypervisor? Even make >> >> >teamd run on the hypervisor side... >> >> >> >> Interesting. That would be more trickier then just to fwd 1 genetlink >> >> socket to the hypervisor. >> >> >> >> Also, I think that the solution should handle multiple guest oses. What >> >> I'm thinking about is some generic bonding description passed over some >> >> communication channel into vm. The...

...ea, but if we need to > >start marshalling configuration requests/hints maybe the entire problem > >could be solved by opening a netlink socket from hypervisor? Even make > >teamd run on the hypervisor side... > > Interesting. That would be more trickier then just to fwd 1 genetlink > socket to the hypervisor. > > Also, I think that the solution should handle multiple guest oses. What > I'm thinking about is some generic bonding description passed over some > communication channel into vm. The vm either use it for configuration, > or ignores it if it is...

...marshalling configuration requests/hints maybe the entire problem > >> >could be solved by opening a netlink socket from hypervisor? Even make > >> >teamd run on the hypervisor side... > >> > >> Interesting. That would be more trickier then just to fwd 1 genetlink > >> socket to the hypervisor. > >> > >> Also, I think that the solution should handle multiple guest oses. What > >> I'm thinking about is some generic bonding description passed over some > >> communication channel into vm. The vm either use it fo...

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:49 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: > Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 05:04:29PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:42 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >>> Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 07:11:19PM CET, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >>>>Patch 1 introduces a new feature bit

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:49 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: > Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 05:04:29PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:42 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >>> Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 07:11:19PM CET, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >>>>Patch 1 introduces a new feature bit

There is a need for communication channel between host and various agents that are running inside a VM guest. The channel will be used for statistic gathering, logging, cut & paste, host screen resolution changes notifications, guest configuration etc. It is undesirable to use TCP/IP for this purpose since network connectivity may not exist between host and guest and if it exists the traffic

There is a need for communication channel between host and various agents that are running inside a VM guest. The channel will be used for statistic gathering, logging, cut & paste, host screen resolution changes notifications, guest configuration etc. It is undesirable to use TCP/IP for this purpose since network connectivity may not exist between host and guest and if it exists the traffic

...evice added: PCI:0000:00:02.0,decodes=io+mem,owns=io+mem,locks=none [ 0.180000] vgaarb: loaded [ 0.180400] vgaarb: bridge control possible 0000:00:02.0 [ 0.181175] PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing [ 0.181940] clocksource: Switched to clocksource hpet [ 0.181940] ACPI: Failed to create genetlink family for ACPI event [ 0.182323] pnp: PnP ACPI init [ 0.183066] pnp: PnP ACPI: found 6 devices [ 0.188367] clocksource: acpi_pm: mask: 0xffffff max_cycles: 0xffffff, max_idle_ns: 2085701024 ns [ 0.189781] pci 0000:00:00.0: Limiting direct PCI/PCI transfers [ 0.190675] pci 0000:00:01...

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:56:30AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 06:06:48PM +0200, Peter Wu wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:55:08PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:42:28AM +0000, Rick Kerkhof wrote: > > > > No, there are not. Here is the recursive directory listing: > > > > > > Are

Hi All, I followed the instructions here at http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/06/10/setup-fedora-11-pv-domu-at-xen-3-4-1-dom0-kernel-2-6-30-rc6-tip-on-top-of-fedora-11/ However, when I do a "make menuconfig", I cannot see any XEN related configuration options. What am I missing? Thank you. Mr. Teo En Ming Dip(Mechatronics Engineering) BEng(Hons)(Mechanical Engineering)