search for: genericisation

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "genericisation".

Did you mean: generalisation
2007 Apr 18
1
rough sketch of revised patching infrastructure
Here's the new patching patch. It compiles, but it doesn't, you know, boot, as such. The basic idea is to make the incremental cost of patching a new hook as small as possible. If a backend wants pure default patch handling, then it can simply call paravirt_patcher with a NULL patch table; this will end up patching calls to be direct calls to the paravirt op, unless the op is NULL or
2007 Apr 18
1
rough sketch of revised patching infrastructure
Here's the new patching patch. It compiles, but it doesn't, you know, boot, as such. The basic idea is to make the incremental cost of patching a new hook as small as possible. If a backend wants pure default patch handling, then it can simply call paravirt_patcher with a NULL patch table; this will end up patching calls to be direct calls to the paravirt op, unless the op is NULL or
2004 Feb 26
2
package 'stats' needs import directive for 1.9.0?
I maintain the Irregular Time Series (its) package on CRAN. I am currently testing a release. Under 1.8.1 I am able to define a S4 generic 'start' as follows: if(!isGeneric("start")) {setGeneric("start", useAsDefault=start)} Under 1.9.0, Rcmd check generates an error, as 'start' is not recognised. If I use the NAMESPACE directive IMPORT, all is well:
2006 May 03
1
Solution: NFS & Dovecot!
Hi folks! It looks like Timo nailed down the NFS issues we've been seeing here in last night's CVS build. Anyone running Dovecot in a high-usage environment should check this out. Here are some relevant ChangeLog updates that seem to address the problem: 2006-05-02 11:11 Timo Sirainen <timo.sirainen at movial.fi> * src/lib-storage/index/maildir/: maildir-save.c,
2014 Oct 24
8
[LLVMdev] First-class debug info IR: MDLocation
I've attached a preliminary patch for `MDLocation` as a follow-up to the RFC [1] last week. It's not commit-ready -- in particular, it squashes a bunch of commits together and doesn't pass `make check` -- but I think it's close enough to indicate the direction and work toward consensus. [1]: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-October/077715.html IMO, the files to