search for: generically

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 18743 matches for "generically".

Did you mean: generally
2011 Jun 29
0
Error in testInstalledBasic
Hi, I am running R 2.13.0 on a Windows 7 machine. I ran the script: testInstalledBasic('devel') and received the following warning message: running tests of consistency of as/is.* creating ?isas-tests.R? running code in ?isas-tests.R? comparing ?isas-tests.Rout? to ?isas-tests.Rout.save? ...running tests of random deviate generation -- fails occasionally running code in
2023 May 04
1
[PATCH 2/2] ocfs2: add error handling path when jbd2 enter ABORT status
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 05:41:29PM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote: > > > On 5/4/23 4:02 PM, Heming Zhao wrote: > > On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 03:34:49PM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 5/4/23 2:21 PM, Heming Zhao wrote: > >>> On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 10:27:46AM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote: > >>>> > >>>> >
2023 May 05
1
[PATCH 2/2] ocfs2: add error handling path when jbd2 enter ABORT status
On 5/5/23 12:20 AM, Heming Zhao wrote: > On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 05:41:29PM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote: >> >> >> On 5/4/23 4:02 PM, Heming Zhao wrote: >>> On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 03:34:49PM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 5/4/23 2:21 PM, Heming Zhao wrote: >>>>> On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 10:27:46AM +0800, Joseph
2023 May 08
1
[PATCH 2/2] ocfs2: add error handling path when jbd2 enter ABORT status
Sorry for reply late, I am a little bit busy recently. On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 11:42:51AM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote: > > > On 5/5/23 12:20 AM, Heming Zhao wrote: > > On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 05:41:29PM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 5/4/23 4:02 PM, Heming Zhao wrote: > >>> On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 03:34:49PM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote:
2023 May 09
1
[PATCH 2/2] ocfs2: add error handling path when jbd2 enter ABORT status
On 5/9/23 12:40 AM, Heming Zhao wrote: > Sorry for reply late, I am a little bit busy recently. > > On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 11:42:51AM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote: >> >> >> On 5/5/23 12:20 AM, Heming Zhao wrote: >>> On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 05:41:29PM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 5/4/23 4:02 PM, Heming Zhao wrote:
2013 Aug 02
3
[PATCH trivial] include: uapi: standard all files' macro prefix and suffix, excluding "linux/" sub-directory
For "include/uapi/*", excluding "linux/" sub-directory, let all files' macro prefix match the standard format, and give related stand comments for their macro suffix. The related standard format is: "_SUBDIRNAME_SUBDIRNAME[_SUBDIRNAME]_FILENAME" (1st _SUBDIRNAME is _UAPI), and use '_' instead of '.' and '-'. Signed-off-by: Chen Gang
2013 Aug 02
3
[PATCH trivial] include: uapi: standard all files' macro prefix and suffix, excluding "linux/" sub-directory
For "include/uapi/*", excluding "linux/" sub-directory, let all files' macro prefix match the standard format, and give related stand comments for their macro suffix. The related standard format is: "_SUBDIRNAME_SUBDIRNAME[_SUBDIRNAME]_FILENAME" (1st _SUBDIRNAME is _UAPI), and use '_' instead of '.' and '-'. Signed-off-by: Chen Gang
2013 Aug 02
3
[PATCH trivial] include: uapi: standard all files' macro prefix and suffix, excluding "linux/" sub-directory
For "include/uapi/*", excluding "linux/" sub-directory, let all files' macro prefix match the standard format, and give related stand comments for their macro suffix. The related standard format is: "_SUBDIRNAME_SUBDIRNAME[_SUBDIRNAME]_FILENAME" (1st _SUBDIRNAME is _UAPI), and use '_' instead of '.' and '-'. Signed-off-by: Chen Gang
2009 Sep 10
1
[Bug 23830] New: nouvea modules on 2.6.31-rc6 failed
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23830 Summary: nouvea modules on 2.6.31-rc6 failed Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy:
2009 Sep 02
20
Re: i686 vs i586 glibc segfault issue on 64-bit AMD Xen paravirt guests
On 09/02/09 01:10, Mitchell E Berger wrote: > I apologize for writing to you directly instead of through an officially > supported channel. No problem. > I''ve filed a bug against glibc in Redhat''s Bugzilla > for an issue that only seems to surface on 64-bit Xen paravirt guests > on AMD hosts. Filing this bug with the distro involved seemed to make > sense,
2004 Oct 05
2
installation help for mac os x
Hi, I'm trying to install R for Mac OS X. I printed out the Mac OS X FAQ (version 1.9-1 2004-03-22) and have been following those instructions step-by-step. I'm a _complete_ novice when it comes to non-mac type software installations and am not very unix literate, but I'm hoping I can get this to work. I'm running a dual 1.8 GHz mac with the latest version of panther.
2014 Nov 25
0
problem with setGroupGeneric from package methods
Hi, There seems to be a problem with setGroupGeneric() from package 'methods'. The symptoms are somewhat erratic, in the sense that small changes may lead to any of the following behaviours. 1.Package works without problems on Windows and installs on Linux but gives error when loaded with library(). 2.Package installs on both systems and gives error when loaded on any of them. 3.
2008 Nov 25
2
dots methods: dispatch issues
There seems to be a bug arising when using multiple S4 generics with "..." as the signature. The following code works as expected: ############################################################## > setGeneric("rbind", function(..., deparse.level=1) standardGeneric("rbind"), + signature = "...") Creating a generic for "rbind" in
2003 Feb 20
2
Who to decide what a generic function should look like?
I am not sure if what I am asking below should be discussed under r-help or r-devel, so please feel free to move over to r-devel. This is a spin off from Gordon Smyth's question about generic functions and Robert Gentleman's reply. I have tried to raise the question before and I am sure this has been discussed by others, but never on the r-help list what I can see. My concern is that
2003 Feb 20
2
Who to decide what a generic function should look like?
I am not sure if what I am asking below should be discussed under r-help or r-devel, so please feel free to move over to r-devel. This is a spin off from Gordon Smyth's question about generic functions and Robert Gentleman's reply. I have tried to raise the question before and I am sure this has been discussed by others, but never on the r-help list what I can see. My concern is that
2014 Jun 17
2
R CMD check warning with S3 method
I'm getting an R CMD check warning with a package (call it package A) that defines an S3 method but not the generic. The generic is defined in another package (package B). Package A imports the S3 generic from B. And there's one additional detail: the generic overrides a function in the stats package. I've created a minimal test package which reproduces the problem:
2013 Nov 15
7
[PATCH 1/2] xfstests: add generic/321 to test fsync() on directories V2
Btrfs had some issues with fsync()''ing directories and fsync()''ing after renames. These three new tests cover the 3 different issues we were seeing. This breaks out the dmflakey stuff into a common helper to be shared between generic/311 and generic/321. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> --- V1->V2: rename test to generic/321 -removed an
2009 Mar 05
6
Heroes of MIght and Magic V
Please, can someone help me with install Heroes? I was reading HOWTO, but I understund it. > If the setup program asks for 'setup.exe', kill it, and then run 'killall -9 IKernel.exe' > Place d3dx9_25.dll in Wine's windows/system32 directory > To allow camera change by holding down the right mouse button, edit input.cfg found in <game dir>/profiles/<profile
2010 Jun 21
4
S3 generics need identical signature?
Dear all, "Writing R Extensions" explicitly says that A method must have all the arguments of the generic, including ... if the generic does. A method must have arguments in exactly the same order as the generic. If the generic specifies defaults, all methods should use the same defaults. This is clear. R CMD check even checks for this. But then how is it possible that
2010 Jul 14
1
RAW_ACLS smbtorture test
Hi All, I wanted to check the state of the ACL evaluation engine in samba. I have configured my linux sles 10, samba version 3.5.1-3.3-2332 with "ea support = yes", "store dos attributes=yes", "vfs objects = acl_xattr" and get lots of error + some failure messages. I attached the results of running the test against both samba as well as native windows 2003 cifs