search for: generic_gpio

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "generic_gpio".

2023 Feb 22
2
GPIO as NUT driver interface?
...thanks! Also just for context, this sounded reminiscent of one of the first NUT drivers, `genericups` (for simple contact-closure support, with IIRC serial-port connections rather than GPIO). Nearby there's also a `generic_modbus" name. Wondering if the new driver should be (similar to) `generic_gpio`. @Community verdict: Then there was also an effort some years ago to name drivers with a `nutdrv-*` prefix... WDYT? As usual, naming is among the hardest problems in IT ;) Jim On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 4:34 PM MODRIS B?RZONIS <modrisb at apollo.lv> wrote: > Jim, > > no, there are...
2023 Feb 22
1
GPIO as NUT driver interface?
Jim Klimov via Nut-upsdev <nut-upsdev at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes: > Nearby there's also a `generic_modbus" name. Wondering if the new driver > should be (similar to) `generic_gpio`. sound good. It would be nice if there were an abstraction layer for various GPIO access methods, rather than hard-coding linux, even if there is only one implementation of the abstraction. I'm not that clear on GPIO, but I gather there are differences. Or maybe there is already a portable...
2023 Feb 23
1
GPIO as NUT driver interface?
...to split into 2 files, may to go for library? On 2/22/23 20:17, Greg Troxel wrote: > Jim Klimov via Nut-upsdev <nut-upsdev at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes: > >> Nearby there's also a `generic_modbus" name. Wondering if the new driver >> should be (similar to) `generic_gpio`. > sound good. > > It would be nice if there were an abstraction layer for various GPIO > access methods, rather than hard-coding linux, even if there is only one > implementation of the abstraction. I'm not that clear on GPIO, but I > gather there are differences. Or maybe...
2023 Feb 23
1
GPIO as NUT driver interface?
...to go for library? > > On 2/22/23 20:17, Greg Troxel wrote: > > Jim Klimov via Nut-upsdev <nut-upsdev at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes: > > > >> Nearby there's also a `generic_modbus" name. Wondering if the new driver > >> should be (similar to) `generic_gpio`. > > sound good. > > > > It would be nice if there were an abstraction layer for various GPIO > > access methods, rather than hard-coding linux, even if there is only one > > implementation of the abstraction. I'm not that clear on GPIO, but I > > gather th...