Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "generic_file_".
2001 Nov 26
0
[andrea@suse.de: Re: VFS bug in 2.4.10+ which applies ulimits to block devices]
...imited? I think it's insane to set file limits for root during boot,
the only problem I know of were because of the old userspace that
doesn't handle correctly the new ulimited defines ~0UL instead of
~0UL>>1.
We can provide total backwards compatibility with a simple IS_BLK check
in generic_file_* in filemap.c, but I'm not sure if it really worth to
add a branch there just for this.
Andrea
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Yusuf Goolamabbas
yusufg@outblaze.com
2001 Nov 26
1
Re: VFS bug in 2.4.10+ which applies ulimits to block devices
...imited? I think it's insane to set file limits for root during boot,
the only problem I know of were because of the old userspace that
doesn't handle correctly the new ulimited defines ~0UL instead of
~0UL>>1.
We can provide total backwards compatibility with a simple IS_BLK check
in generic_file_* in filemap.c, but I'm not sure if it really worth to
add a branch there just for this.
Andrea
2001 Sep 19
2
Coda and Ext3
Hi everyone,
The Linux Coda drivers and the ext3 patches don't seem to get along
very well, at least in Linux 2.4.7. I've got a stock 2.4.7 kernel with
a patch applied to the USB drivers (for a sony digital camera; see
http://www.sujal.net/tech/linux/ just a change in unusual_devs.h).
After I applied the ext3 patches from
http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ . Basically,