Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "generatepch".
Did you mean:
generatech
2017 Dec 09
2
[cfe-dev] Who wants faster LLVM/Clang builds?
...opInfo.cpp 2.43 1.68 -30.7% 101.6 82.5 -18.8%
unittests/CodeGen/CodeGenExternalTest.cpp 4.50 3.21 -28.6% 155.5 125.1 -19.5%
lib/Driver/ToolChains/Contiki.cpp 0.53 0.38 -28.1% 42.4 38.0 -10.5%
unittests/Tooling/RefactoringActionRulesTest.cpp 3.22 2.34 -27.5% 108.3 90.0 -16.9%
lib/Serialization/GeneratePCH.cpp 2.38 1.78 -25.1% 83.8 71.1 -15.1%
Full list:
The updated patches:
Thanks,
Michael
> On Dec 8, 2017, at 9:20 AM, Quentin Colombet via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Dec 6, 2017, at 1:17 PM, Matthias Braun via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at...
2017 Dec 15
3
[cfe-dev] Who wants faster LLVM/Clang builds?
....7% 101.6 82.5 -18.8%
> unittests/CodeGen/CodeGenExternalTest.cpp 4.50 3.21 -28.6% 155.5 125.1
> -19.5%
> lib/Driver/ToolChains/Contiki.cpp 0.53 0.38 -28.1% 42.4 38.0 -10.5%
> unittests/Tooling/RefactoringActionRulesTest.cpp 3.22 2.34 -27.5% 108.3
> 90.0 -16.9%
> lib/Serialization/GeneratePCH.cpp 2.38 1.78 -25.1% 83.8 71.1 -15.1%
>
> Full list:
> <clang.txt>
>
>
> The updated patches:
> <llvm_redundant_headers.patch>
> <clang_redundant_headers.patch>
>
> Thanks,
> Michael
>
> On Dec 8, 2017, at 9:20 AM, Quentin Colombet via llvm-d...
2017 Dec 06
3
[cfe-dev] Who wants faster LLVM/Clang builds?
- We do indeed have a lot of unnecessary includes around in llvm (or pretty much any other C++ project for that matter).
- I want faster builds.
- The only way to reliably fight this is indeed automatic tools.
- Having the right amount of includes also has documentation value and ideally let's you understand the structure of your project.
- However relying on transitive includes works contrary