Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "generatecfile".
Did you mean:
generate_files
2005 Aug 01
2
[LLVMdev] [patch] gccld not passing -export-dynamic to gcc for link
...Code.cpp 8 Jul 2005 16:48:52 -0000 1.50
+++ tools/gccld/GenerateCode.cpp 1 Aug 2005 22:06:26 -0000
@@ -325,8 +325,7 @@
return sys::Program::ExecuteAndWait(llc, &args[0]);
}
-/// GenerateAssembly - generates a native assembly language source file from the
-/// specified bytecode file.
+/// GenerateCFile - generates a C source file from the specified bytecode file.
int llvm::GenerateCFile(const std::string &OutputFile,
const std::string &InputFile,
const sys::Path &llc,
@@ -344,7 +343,7 @@
return sys::Program::ExecuteAndWait(llc, &am...
2005 Aug 02
0
[LLVMdev] [patch] gccld not passing -export-dynamic to gcc for link
...Code.cpp 8 Jul 2005 16:48:52 -0000 1.50
+++ tools/gccld/GenerateCode.cpp 2 Aug 2005 04:11:11 -0000
@@ -325,8 +325,7 @@
return sys::Program::ExecuteAndWait(llc, &args[0]);
}
-/// GenerateAssembly - generates a native assembly language source file from the
-/// specified bytecode file.
+/// GenerateCFile - generates a C source file from the specified bytecode file.
int llvm::GenerateCFile(const std::string &OutputFile,
const std::string &InputFile,
const sys::Path &llc,
@@ -344,8 +343,8 @@
return sys::Program::ExecuteAndWait(llc, &am...
2007 Jul 05
2
[LLVMdev] PATCH (rest of code changes) "bytecode" --> "bitcode"
Here is the bulk of the sanitizing.
My residual doubts center around the question
whether we still do/want to support (un)compressed *byte*code
in 2.0/2.1.
I need a definitive word on this to proceed.
My understanding is that bytecode is already gone, but there are
still some functions/enums that really deal with *byte*code
(instead of *bit*code).
I did not touch those areas, so the attached