search for: generaliz

It sounds as thought you are interested in Hoyt's Anova which is a form of generalizability theory. This is usually estimated using by getting the variance components from ANOVA. > -----Original Message----- > From: r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch > [mailto:r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch] On Behalf Of Karl Knoblick > Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 6:10 AM > T...

...o Ogg/Vorbis brings an interesting challenge: What do we do with the audio after decoding it? The following sane options exist: A) Simply output the B-format audio B) Produce a downmix 1) Mono. 2) Stereo blumlein crossed pairs 3) Stereo UHJ 4) binaural C) Produce speaker feeds 1) Fully generalizable speaker feed decoder (such as http://www.kokkinizita.net/linuxaudio/adec-pict.html) 2) G-format (fixed decode for the 5.1 layout) (A) is pretty much a no-brainer, and minus some polish on marking up the channel mapping we pretty much already do it today. I think that some form of down...

...>lines(c(0,time1,time1), c(1,1,0),lty=3) does what I want, BUT the second leg does not touch the x-axis since the auto-scaling of the y-axis does not start at'0' but slightly negative. I could now adjust the line length by 'trial and error' to suit my needs, but I'd prefer a generalizable solution like >lines(c(<some_macro_for_y-axis_position>,time1,time1), + c(1,1,<some_macro_for_x-axis_position>),lty=3) Can somebody help me out with this? Thanks, Joh

...bles are available to writers who use main()." Nevertheless, using a main function with other functions defined outside it seems like a good quick alternative that offers similar advantages to making a package when functions are tightly coupled to the script and the project may not be large or generalizable enough to warrant making a package. Best, CG

...right place to add this logic to? I'm thinking ScalarEvolution (so that this gets picked up by SimplifyIndVar), but maybe there is a more idiomatic place? The case above is a simplified form of my real workload, which involves smin and smax expressions; so the implementation has to be easily generalizable to such cases. Thanks, -- Sanjoy

...ready does various things to optimize away many of the things that simplify cfg does. I'm planning several extensions to the pass, in particular to support limited forms of "predication" (PPC's conditional return for sure, perhaps some better cmov formation, etc). This may be generalizable for IA64/ARM, but it depends on how much time I have to work on it. If there are specific cases like this where simplify cfg produces better code than branch folding (with the hooks implemented) please file bugzilla bugs to track them. Long term, I'd like to get the code generator to t...

...s1 5 4.8 4 s2 6.1 6 7 s3 7 6.5 6 And then do the pairwise correlations between {p1,p2},{p2,p3}.{p2,p3} I can do all of this manually, i.e., using some messy case specific code, but can anyone please point out the best way to do this in a more generalizable way. Thanks for any help you can give a novice! Claus

...one, is because locals do not have a physical offset assigned at that time. There is a peephole optimization pass after the stack frame is finalized, but the problem with folding them there is that the physical registers have also been assigned, so register CX (in this case) would be wasted. So I generalized the concept of a "full address". There were four variables, base reg, scale, index reg and displacement, that were being passed around. I converted them into a single struct and added a new type field that allows the base reg to instead be a frame index. The extra lea instruction is...

Hi, how can I get a more descriptive text instead of the variable names in my XY-lattice plot, according to the table below? Variable text acet = "Acetylaspartate Thalamus" chol = "Choline Thalamus" acetp = "Acetylaspartate parieoc" ino = "Inositole Thalamus" I could not find a solution. Please have a look at my syntax. Thanks a lot,

...I'm thinking ScalarEvolution (so that this gets >> picked up by SimplifyIndVar), but maybe there is a more idiomatic >> place? The case above is a simplified form of my real workload, which >> involves smin and smax expressions; so the implementation has to be >> easily generalizable to such cases. > > > Before reading your two steps I was going to suggest jump threading. Jump > threading is where we optimize redundant tests across blocks that feed into > branches (block A tests property X and branches to block B which also tests > property X). However jum...

It looks like createCFGSimplificationPass was disabled on 2006/09/04. This causes some problems for architectures that use conditional moves to implement select (alpha and ARM). For example, on 2006/09/03 a "if (a) return 0; else return 1;" compiled to ---------------------------------------- zapnot $17,15,$1 zapnot $16,15,$2 bis $31,$31,$0 cmpeq $2,$1,$1

...IR we've managed to mostly avoid these kinds of features/complications in the past. I'm definitely interested in hearing some alternate implementations here and there rather than a full set of constants for relocations. Keeping the IR abstract enough over the object file level other than in generalizable cases still feels like a win. -eric On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 8:44 PM Chris Lattner via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi Leonard, > > I haven’t looked at your patch in detail, but I think that this is a step > in the right direction. I would like to see new...

I''m wondering if ferret has any built-in search/replace mechanism that I might be able to use to highlight the query data in each search result. The reason I think this would be a good idea is that I could end up having to practically duplicate the ferret query parser just to interpret the query so that I can figure out how to highlight the keywords in the search results. Just in case

...education and psychology, is in Gigerenzer et al. 1999. The Empire of Chance. Cambridge Univ Press. There is a lot more that could be added to what Gigerenzer at al say, but that book is a good start. There are books waiting to be written: 1) on the different traditions of multi-level modeling, generalizability theory etc, that have grown up in different application areas. 2) on the different notational conventions that have grown up in different areas. In reading Fisher, modern readers have the problem that he does not follow conventions that had not been invented (!) when he wrote. The diiffi...

...o writers > who use main()." Nevertheless, using a main function with other functions > defined outside it seems like a good quick alternative that offers similar > advantages to making a package when functions are tightly coupled to the > script and the project may not be large or generalizable enough to warrant > making a package. > > > > I think the idea that making a package is too hard is just wrong. > Packages in R have lots of requirements, but nowadays there are tools > that make them easy. Eleven years ago at UseR in Dortmund I wrote a > package during...

...of scoring students is complex and our code makes use of sapply many times for each student. The toy example used length just to illustrate, our actual code doesn't do that. But your point is well taken, there may be a very good counterexample why my proposal doesn't achieve the goal is a generalizable way. -----Original Message----- From: Martin Morgan [mailto:martin.morgan at roswellpark.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 9:43 AM To: Doran, Harold <HDoran at air.org>; 'r-help at r-project.org' <r-help at r-project.org> Subject: Re: [R] Possible Improvement to sapply...

...s is complex and our code makes use of sapply many times for each student. > > > > The toy example used length just to illustrate, our actual code doesn't do that. But your point is well taken, there may be a very good counterexample why my proposal doesn't achieve the goal is a generalizable way. > > [.................]

...ng students is complex and our code makes use of sapply many times for each student. > > The toy example used length just to illustrate, our actual code doesn't do that. But your point is well taken, there may be a very good counterexample why my proposal doesn't achieve the goal is a generalizable way. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Morgan [mailto:martin.morgan at roswellpark.org<mailto:martin.morgan at roswellpark.org>] > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 9:43 AM > To: Doran, Harold <HDoran at air.org<mailto:HDoran at air.org>>; '...

...through this link: https://www.facebook.com/SoftwareCodeQuality/photos/?tab=album&album_id=1639816749664288 The results will be shared in a public webpage and everyone possible will be invited to learn and discuss them. Your knowledge and experience is vital for achieving substantial and generalizable results, and your effort is much appreciated! Sincerely Vard Antinyan PhD candidate in University of Gothenburg, Sweden Tel: 0046317725707 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20160922/a92...

...bles are available to writers who use main()." Nevertheless, using a main function with other functions defined outside it seems like a good quick alternative that offers similar advantages to making a package when functions are tightly coupled to the script and the project may not be large or generalizable enough to warrant making a package. > I think the idea that making a package is too hard is just wrong. Packages in R have lots of requirements, but nowadays there are tools that make them easy. Eleven years ago at UseR in Dortmund I wrote a package during a 45 minute presentation, and...