Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "gen_push".
Did you mean:
can_push
2009 Sep 18
2
[LLVMdev] OT: intel darwin losing primary target status
...GISTER, CFA_RESTORE): New.
* rtl.def (EH_RETURN): New.
* rtl.h (eh_returnjump_p, maybe_copy_epilogue_insn): Declare.
* config/bfin/bfin.md (UNSPEC_VOLATILE_EH_RETURN): Remove.
(eh_return_internal): Use eh_return rtx; split w/ epilogue.
* config/i386/i386.c (gen_push): Update cfa state.
(pro_epilogue_adjust_stack): Add set_cfa argument. When true,
add a CFA_ADJUST_CFA note.
(ix86_dwarf_handle_frame_unspec): Remove.
(ix86_expand_prologue): Update cfa state.
(ix86_emit_restore_reg_using_pop): New.
(ix86_emit_restor...
2009 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] OT: intel darwin losing primary target status
On Sep 18, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:28:15AM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote:
>> So, when these test cases are run, is the binary linked against /usr/
>> lib/libgcc_s.10.5.dylib? or against some just built libgcc_s.
>> 10.5.dylib?
>> or against some just build libgcc_s.dylib? If either of the
>> latter, then
>> if you
2009 Sep 18
4
[LLVMdev] OT: intel darwin losing primary target status
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:28:15AM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote:
> So, when these test cases are run, is the binary linked against /usr/
> lib/libgcc_s.10.5.dylib? or against some just built libgcc_s.10.5.dylib?
> or against some just build libgcc_s.dylib? If either of the latter, then
> if you changed the FSF build of libgcc_s for darwin to have the right
> magic symbols, then