search for: gen_codegen

...le mistake on my part, or is LLVM not supported against the 10.4 sdk? The problem disappears if I build against 10.5 sdk (using llvm-gcc 4.2), but unfortunately that's not possible for the application in question. Here's the (abriged) build command: CompileC build/Objects-normal/i386/gen_codegen.o gen_codegen.cpp normal i386 c++ com.apple.compilers.gcc.4_0 cd llvm /Developer/usr/bin/gcc-4.0 -x c++ -arch i386 -fmessage-length=0 - pipe -Wno-trigraphs -fpascal-strings -fasm-blocks -O0 -isysroot / Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -mmacosx- version-min=1...

...gure llvm with the 10.4 SDK, otherwise autoconf will think that backtrace exists. I'm not exactly how to do this. Another option is to hack out '#define HAVE_BACKTRACE 1' from include/llvm/Config/config.h after you configure. -Chris > > CompileC build/Objects-normal/i386/gen_codegen.o gen_codegen.cpp > normal i386 c++ com.apple.compilers.gcc.4_0 > cd llvm > /Developer/usr/bin/gcc-4.0 -x c++ -arch i386 -fmessage-length=0 - > pipe -Wno-trigraphs -fpascal-strings -fasm-blocks -O0 -isysroot / > Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -...

Hi, For the record, adding UNIVERSAL_SDK_PATH=/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk/ was insufficient to restrict the .a/.o files to link against the 10.4 sdk, but env MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.4 make did the trick. Thanks! On Jan 14, 2009, at 1:29 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote: > > Le 14 janv. 09 à 21:48, Chris Lattner a écrit : > >> >> On Jan 14, 2009, at 12:44 PM,

Le 14 janv. 09 à 21:48, Chris Lattner a écrit : > > On Jan 14, 2009, at 12:44 PM, Graham Wakefield wrote: > >> Sorry if this is a newb q... I'm developing an application on a >> 10.5 machine but want to target the 10.4 SDK. Is there a magic >> incantation for the llvm configure script to set the sysroot path, >> equivalent to e.g. --with-sysroot