search for: gemdependency

Seen when running scripts/console, Ruby version not important. What is this telling me? Loading development environment (Rails 2.3.5) /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/rails/ gem_dependency.rb:119:Warning: Gem::Dependency#version_requirements is deprecated and will be removed on or after August 2010. Use #requirement Checking gem_dependency.rb shows: 118: def requirement

...Boot def run load_initializer Rails::Initializer.run(:set_load_path) end end class VendorBoot < Boot def load_initializer require "#{RAILS_ROOT}/vendor/rails/railties/lib/initializer" Rails::Initializer.run(:install_gem_spec_stubs) Rails::GemDependency.add_frozen_gem_path end end class GemBoot < Boot def load_initializer self.class.load_rubygems load_rails_gem require ''initializer'' end def load_rails_gem if version = self.class.gem_version gem ''rails'', ve...

when i run * rake db:create* * * WARNING: ''require ''rake/rdoctask'''' is deprecated. Please use ''require ''rdoc/task'' (in RDoc 2.4.2+)'' instead. at /home/vishnu/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.8.7-p352-D9TI4Ms3gBgeRYYz77F+sQ@public.gmane.org/gems/rake-0.9.2.2/lib/rake/rdoctask.rb DEPRECATION WARNING: Rake tasks in

1) I installed the ruby-1.9.2-p0 and rubygems-1.3.7 in the (/usr/local/src directory ) 2) Then i installed rails from terminal by typing follwoing sudo gem install rails --include-dependencies 3) Then i made a rails applcation from terminal as rails new demo then cd demo ruby

...config/boot.rb index cd21fb9..0ad0f78 100644 --- a/src/config/boot.rb +++ b/src/config/boot.rb @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ module Rails def load_initializer require "#{RAILS_ROOT}/vendor/rails/railties/lib/initializer" Rails::Initializer.run(:install_gem_spec_stubs) + Rails::GemDependency.add_frozen_gem_path end end @@ -67,7 +68,7 @@ module Rails class << self def rubygems_version - Gem::RubyGemsVersion if defined? Gem::RubyGemsVersion + Gem::RubyGemsVersion rescue nil end def gem_version @@ -82,14 +83,14 @@ module Rails...

Note that one of the 8 patches (#6) will be sent separately in reply to this email, as some of the replaced lines are too long, so git won't let me send the email. However, there is nothing wrong with that patch, and it should be applied in the sequence listed below. Note also that I assume this will be tested on a clean f11 install, rather than an upgrade of an existing ovirt server