search for: geerts

Hi Krzysztof, On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 9:07 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert at linux-m68k.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 5:53 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org> wrote: > > The ioread8/16/32() and others have inconsistent interface among the > > architectures: some taking address as const, some not. > > > > It seems there is nothing really stopping

Le 08/01/2020 ? 09:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski a ?crit?: > On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 09:13, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert at linux-m68k.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Krzysztof, >> >> On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 9:07 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert at linux-m68k.org> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 5:53 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org> wrote: >>>>

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 09:36:13AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > As a result of backporting a bugfix, virtio_net started passing void * > > to page_address, assuming that it will get silently converted to struct > > page *. But this does not happen on architectures where page_address

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 09:36:13AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > As a result of backporting a bugfix, virtio_net started passing void * > > to page_address, assuming that it will get silently converted to struct > > page *. But this does not happen on architectures where page_address

Hi, I'm quite new to the R-project. I was suggested to look into it because I am trying to solve the "Subset sum" problem", which basically is: Given a set of integers and an integer s, does any non-empty subset sum to s? (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subset_sum_problem) I have been searching the web for quite some time now (which is how I eventually discovered that my

Hi Christophe, On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 9:35 AM Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy at c-s.fr> wrote: > Le 08/01/2020 ? 09:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski a ?crit : > > On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 09:13, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert at linux-m68k.org> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 9:07 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert at linux-m68k.org> wrote: > >>> On Tue, Jan 7,

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 01:03:24PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > virtio 1.0 makes all memory structures LE, so > > we need APIs to conditionally do a byteswap on BE > > architectures. > > > > To make it easier to check code statically, > > add virtio specific types

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 01:03:24PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > virtio 1.0 makes all memory structures LE, so > > we need APIs to conditionally do a byteswap on BE > > architectures. > > > > To make it easier to check code statically, > > add virtio specific types

On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 05:35:36PM +0200, Geert Stappers via Syslinux wrote: > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 08:55:53AM -0500, Clements, James wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 Geert Stappers wrote > > > 13:36:47.964636 IP 192.168.205.1.47973 > 192.168.205.50.1938: UDP, length 30 > > > 13:36:47.964685 IP 192.168.205.50.1938 > 192.168.205.1.47973: UDP, length 4 > >

On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 07:37:44PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: <snip/> > > As far as I can tell, GMail does process the SPF/DKIM/DMARC properties > > but ignores Yahoo!'s DMARC policy to reject on failure. > > The Syslinux ML should now be ready for DMARC p=reject > > We shall see how

On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:27 AM, gene.cumm at yahoo.com <gene.cumm at yahoo.com> wrote: > > Test from Yahoo via Android > > > > --Gene > > _______________________________________________ > > Syslinux mailing list > > Submissions to Syslinux at zytor.com > > Unsubscribe or set options at:

Hi Geert, Le 08/01/2020 ? 09:43, Geert Uytterhoeven a ?crit?: > Hi Christophe, > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 9:35 AM Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy at c-s.fr> wrote: >> Le 08/01/2020 ? 09:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski a ?crit : >>> On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 09:13, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert at linux-m68k.org> wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 9:07 AM Geert

Hi, I have an intermittent pxelinux boot problem. It happens rarely, for example it happened one day and then did not happen again until 6 days later. However when it does happen it is rather serious as it affects all clients on the network. Here is some basic info: - IBM netvista PCs, built-in pxe, banner says it is "PXE 2.x". - happens rarely, but when it does it affects all clients.

On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert at linux-m68k.org> wrote: > JFYI, when comparing v4.7-rc6[1] to v4.7-rc5[3], the summaries are: > - build errors: +3/-2 + /home/kisskb/slave/src/drivers/vhost/vhost.c: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_844' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: __alignof__ *vq->avail > VRING_AVAIL_ALIGN_SIZE:

On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert at linux-m68k.org> wrote: > JFYI, when comparing v4.7-rc6[1] to v4.7-rc5[3], the summaries are: > - build errors: +3/-2 + /home/kisskb/slave/src/drivers/vhost/vhost.c: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_844' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: __alignof__ *vq->avail > VRING_AVAIL_ALIGN_SIZE:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 06:15:11AM +0200 > > Thank you for the replies. I do appreciate it. > I appreciate a verdict/judgement/decision on patches. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWXTGWAAoJECE10SPYwZvsi+oQAJwRreo5RlzmhbMQ/me5j3l+

On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 07:49:46PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > > It is not important how long I have been moderator for this mailinglist. > > Thing is that I'm thinking about stepping back. > > > } Who would like to help the Syslinux project by moderating this ML? > > I'm willing to help with

Op 2014-06-12 om 06:43 schreef Geert Stappers: > Op 2014-06-10 om 22:55 schreef Geert Stappers: > > > > Hello, > > > > A `make efi32` yeilds me > > > > make[3]: *** No rule to make target `efi32/com32/lib/memcmp.o', needed by `syslinux.so'. Stop. > > make[3]: Leaving directory `efi32/efi' > > make[2]: *** [efi] Error 2 >

Hi Michael, On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 10:57 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 04:51:19PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2020/4/17 ??4:46, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 04:39:49PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > On 2020/4/17 ??4:29, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Apr

Sorry for makeing a new post, but I already erased my old mails. In the following I describe my Server-Situation (Sorry for my bad english) * I have a eisfair server http://www.eisfair.org with version 1.6.1 (newest) * I have a ISC-DHCPD 3 Server running * I have a TFTP Server running http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/network/tftp/ * I have Samba installed and a DNS Server is running My