Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "gdwarf2".
Did you mean:
gdwarf
2012 Oct 18
0
[LLVMdev] DWARF 2/3 backwards compatibility?
...flags. I can see cases
where compatibility is 2,3 or 2,3,4, so maybe the flag is a number to allow
<=3 tests, have to sleep on that. This flag must go to the backend.
Then the patch will change the conditional for DW_FORM_flag_present that
caused the problem back to the old DW_FORM_flag when -gdwarf2 or 3 is set.
In the future, there is a now a place to address compatibility issues that
come up.
----
Monitoring this with GDB Testsuite as Jenkins or Buildbot would be a good
idea. 20K+ tests are difficult to duplicate.
GDB Testsuite is not easy to run and get stable, but I've been doing...
2012 Oct 18
6
[LLVMdev] DWARF 2/3 backwards compatibility?
Rick Foos wrote:
> The error we are getting is:
> “Undefined Form Value: 25”
> ...
> DW_FORM_flag_present caused the problem. The old DW_FORM_flag works for us.
I see this error from GDB 7.0 but GDB 7.2 is okay with it.
Now you know as much as I do. :-)
Eric Christopher wrote:
> [in reply to what Renato Golin wrote:]
> > With time, you might get to a point where Dwarf is a
2008 Mar 05
0
Press delete key three times in R-2.6.1 to get segmentation fault (PR#10892)
...e 0x0, keycode 107 (keysym 0xffff, Delete), same_screen YES,
XLookupString gives 1 bytes: ""
Here are the specs for the gcc that compiled R:
$ gcc -dumpspecs
*asm:
%{v:-V} %{Qy:} %{!Qn:-Qy} %{n} %{T} %{Ym,*} %{Yd,*} %{Wa,*:%*}
*asm_debug:
%{gstabs*:--gstabs}%{!gstabs*:%{g*:--gdwarf2}}
*asm_final:
*asm_options:
%a %Y %{c:%W{o*}%{!o*:-o %w%b%O}}%{!c:-o %d%w%u%O}
*invoke_as:
%{!S:-o %|.s |
as %(asm_options) %|.s %A }
*cpp:
%{posix:-D_POSIX_SOURCE} %{pthread:-D_REENTRANT}
*cpp_options:
%(cpp_unique_options) %1 %{m*} %{std*&ansi&trigraphs} %{W*&pedantic...