search for: gdunn01

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "gdunn01".

2006 Jun 22
1
Share is read-only despite read only = no
The owner of a folder (userid gdunn01) is unable to make any changes to it (rename / delete) through Samba despite being listed as having read/write perms. I'm using winbind for username mapping. I feel like I'm missing something simple. ma21cab5# wbinfo -t checking the trust secret via RPC calls succeeded ma21cab5# ls -ld...
2006 Oct 05
1
Winbindd and getent group problem
Hi, I installed and configured Samba 3.0.23c as a domain member. I am running winbindd on Solaris 8 Sparc. I am seeing a strange behavior after the configuration. If I issue a "wbinfo -g" I see all the NT groups. Likewise, if I issue a "wbinfo -u" I see all the NT users. Continuing on with a "getent passwd" shows me the combined Unix and NT accounts, but
2007 Jun 05
0
mod_auth_ntlm_winbind under apache2 : NTLMSSP NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER
Ubuntu Server 7.04 Apache/2.2.3 (Ubuntu) PHP/5.2.1 mod_perl/2.0.2 Perl/v5.8.8 mod_auth_ntml_winbind from svn June 5, 2007. samba 3.0.24-2ubuntu1.2 winbind is working, I can log into the machine as an AD domain user. graham@wtldevapp1:~$ sudo ntlm_auth --username=gdunn01 password: NT_STATUS_OK: Success (0x0) from the conf.d/twiki.conf: AuthName "NTLM Authentication" NTLMAuth on NegotiateAuth On NTLMAuthHelper "/usr/bin/ntlm_auth --helper-protocol=squid-2.5-ntlmssp -d 400" NegotiateAuthHelper "/usr/bin/ntlm_auth --helpe...
2006 Oct 02
0
ridmap info has changed
After a restart, I'm seeing all the userid's change. Which I thought idmap_rid was supposed to prevent. I see this in log.winbind from an ls -l. [2006/10/02 17:20:52, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_group.c:winbindd_getgrgid(340) Can't find domain from sid Any ideas what's happened? wbinfo -u and -g seem to work # wbinfo -u | wc -l 28724 # wbinfo -g | wc -l 13270 Thanks, Graham
2006 Oct 26
1
File size limits with samba 3.0.20b and FreeBSD 5.3
We're seeing problems with copying files > 2BG to a samba share. Google says that, as of 2004, there was a 2GB file size limit in that scenario, but I haven't found anything more recent. Is that still the case or am I looking at a different problem? Thanks, Graham