Displaying 20 results from an estimated 115 matches for "gcosta".
Did you mean:
costa
2008 Feb 11
3
[PATCH 1/5] Change vsmp compile dependency
Change Makefile so vsmp_64.o object is dependent
on PARAVIRT, rather than X86_VSMP
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ravikiran Thirumalai <kiran@scalemp.com>
Acked-by: Shai Fultheim <shai@scalemp.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
index 21dc1a0..71...
2007 Dec 12
5
[PATCH 0/6] paravirt patches - the non-integration part
Hi,
This series corresponds do older patches in the paravirt series
that was neither already applied, nor I will touch again. In general,
they do not touch code that can be unified (at least, without being the
unification a big problem on its own).
They passed through this list a lot of times, so I feel them ready for
inclusion, unless someone opposes.
As with the other patches, they apply to
2007 Dec 12
5
[PATCH 0/6] paravirt patches - the non-integration part
Hi,
This series corresponds do older patches in the paravirt series
that was neither already applied, nor I will touch again. In general,
they do not touch code that can be unified (at least, without being the
unification a big problem on its own).
They passed through this list a lot of times, so I feel them ready for
inclusion, unless someone opposes.
As with the other patches, they apply to
2008 Jan 18
4
[PATCH 0/6] lguest patches for compiling x86_64
Right now, I have lguest in-tree module compiling on x86_64.
It's not yet on a sendable state, since the module itself isn't loading.
However, this subset of the series is pretty straightforward, and I'm sending it
now aiming at reducing the delta size in the future ;-)
Have fun,
2008 Jan 18
4
[PATCH 0/6] lguest patches for compiling x86_64
Right now, I have lguest in-tree module compiling on x86_64.
It's not yet on a sendable state, since the module itself isn't loading.
However, this subset of the series is pretty straightforward, and I'm sending it
now aiming at reducing the delta size in the future ;-)
Have fun,
2007 Dec 04
10
[PATCH 0/10] Integrate msr.h
Hello,
This series of patches integrates msr.h header.
What it really does, is a series of steps to allow us
to get rid of duplicate code between i386 and x86_64 versions
With this done, achieving paravirt for x86_64 gets really easy,
just a couple of extra code.
The first patch was already sent a while ago, but was not yet pushed
to any tree , to my knowledge. So it is sent again. Also,
2007 Dec 04
10
[PATCH 0/10] Integrate msr.h
Hello,
This series of patches integrates msr.h header.
What it really does, is a series of steps to allow us
to get rid of duplicate code between i386 and x86_64 versions
With this done, achieving paravirt for x86_64 gets really easy,
just a couple of extra code.
The first patch was already sent a while ago, but was not yet pushed
to any tree , to my knowledge. So it is sent again. Also,
2008 Jan 18
6
[PATCH 0/10] Tree fixes for PARAVIRT
Hi,
This small series provides some more fixes towards the goal
to have the PARAVIRT selectable for x86_64. After that, just
some more small steps are needed.
The first fix is not even specific for PARAVIRT, and it's actually
preventing the whole tree from booting.
2008 Jan 18
6
[PATCH 0/10] Tree fixes for PARAVIRT
Hi,
This small series provides some more fixes towards the goal
to have the PARAVIRT selectable for x86_64. After that, just
some more small steps are needed.
The first fix is not even specific for PARAVIRT, and it's actually
preventing the whole tree from booting.
2008 Jun 10
2
[PATCH] Do not calculate linear rip in emulation failure report
If we're not gonna do anything (case in which failure is already
reported), we do not need to even bother with calculating the linear rip.
This is a nitpick, but I saw it while doing some testing, so here's
the patch.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta at redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 77fb2bd..191fef1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -2026,11 +2026,11 @@ void kvm_report_emulation_failure(str...
2008 Jun 10
2
[PATCH] Do not calculate linear rip in emulation failure report
If we're not gonna do anything (case in which failure is already
reported), we do not need to even bother with calculating the linear rip.
This is a nitpick, but I saw it while doing some testing, so here's
the patch.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta at redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 77fb2bd..191fef1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -2026,11 +2026,11 @@ void kvm_report_emulation_failure(str...
2007 Aug 08
19
Introducing paravirt_ops for x86_64
Hi folks,
After some time away from it, and a big rebase as a consequence, here is
the updated version of paravirt_ops for x86_64, heading to inclusion.
Your criticism is of course, very welcome.
Have fun
--
arch/x86_64/Kconfig | 11
arch/x86_64/ia32/syscall32.c | 2
arch/x86_64/kernel/Makefile | 1
arch/x86_64/kernel/apic.c | 2
2007 Aug 08
19
Introducing paravirt_ops for x86_64
Hi folks,
After some time away from it, and a big rebase as a consequence, here is
the updated version of paravirt_ops for x86_64, heading to inclusion.
Your criticism is of course, very welcome.
Have fun
--
arch/x86_64/Kconfig | 11
arch/x86_64/ia32/syscall32.c | 2
arch/x86_64/kernel/Makefile | 1
arch/x86_64/kernel/apic.c | 2
2007 Nov 09
11
[PATCH 0/24] paravirt_ops for unified x86 - that's me again!
Hey folks,
Here's a new spin of the pvops64 patch series.
We didn't get that many comments from the last time,
so it should be probably almost ready to get in. Heya!
>From the last version, the most notable changes are:
* consolidation of system.h, merging jeremy's comments about ordering
concerns
* consolidation of smp functions that goes through smp_ops. They're sharing
2007 Nov 09
11
[PATCH 0/24] paravirt_ops for unified x86 - that's me again!
Hey folks,
Here's a new spin of the pvops64 patch series.
We didn't get that many comments from the last time,
so it should be probably almost ready to get in. Heya!
>From the last version, the most notable changes are:
* consolidation of system.h, merging jeremy's comments about ordering
concerns
* consolidation of smp functions that goes through smp_ops. They're sharing
2007 Aug 10
9
[PATCH 0/25 -v2] paravirt_ops for x86_64, second round
Here is an slightly updated version of the paravirt_ops patch.
If your comments and criticism were welcome before, now it's even more!
There are some issues that are _not_ addressed in this revision, and here
are the causes:
* split debugreg into multiple functions, suggested by Andi:
- Me and jsfg agree that introducing more pvops (specially 14!) is
not worthwhile. So, although we do
2007 Aug 10
9
[PATCH 0/25 -v2] paravirt_ops for x86_64, second round
Here is an slightly updated version of the paravirt_ops patch.
If your comments and criticism were welcome before, now it's even more!
There are some issues that are _not_ addressed in this revision, and here
are the causes:
* split debugreg into multiple functions, suggested by Andi:
- Me and jsfg agree that introducing more pvops (specially 14!) is
not worthwhile. So, although we do
2007 Dec 13
2
[PATCH] avoid ifdefs in desc.h, getting rid of pack_ldt and pack_tss
By Andi Kleen's suggestion, this patch removes pack_ldt() and pack_tss()
wrappers in favour of a general wrapper. It saves us an ifdef and some lines
of code, but more importantly, it's more elegant.
No functional change is made.
Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
---
include/asm-x86/desc.h | 55 ++++++++++++++---------------------------------
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-x86/desc.h b/include/asm-x86/desc.h
index 8849666..e302a02 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86/desc.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86/desc.h...
2007 Dec 13
2
[PATCH] avoid ifdefs in desc.h, getting rid of pack_ldt and pack_tss
By Andi Kleen's suggestion, this patch removes pack_ldt() and pack_tss()
wrappers in favour of a general wrapper. It saves us an ifdef and some lines
of code, but more importantly, it's more elegant.
No functional change is made.
Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
---
include/asm-x86/desc.h | 55 ++++++++++++++---------------------------------
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-x86/desc.h b/include/asm-x86/desc.h
index 8849666..e302a02 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86/desc.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86/desc.h...
2007 Dec 05
3
[PATCH 0/9 - v2] Integrate system.h
Hi,
At Ingo's request, here it goes a new patchset, that actually
applies ontop of the x86 tree (mm branch). Besides this issue,
I've also included a patch that remove the cr8 references, as Andi
suggested.