search for: gcc3.5

hi, what difference is between gcc3.5 tree-ssa and llvm? yueqiang 2003/12/24

On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, yue wrote: > what difference is between gcc3.5 tree-ssa and llvm? They are completely different projects. The short version is that LLVM is more mature and stable than tree-ssa is, LLVM supports interprocedural and runtime optimization, and LLVM has a well defined intermediate representation with a textual format. On the other hand tree-ssa may be a part of GCC 3.5

Does LLVM called the pthread directly? and what time do you plan to release Java front end? I'll try this. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Lattner" <sabre at nondot.org> To: "yue" <qiangyue at ict.ac.cn> Cc: <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 12:47 PM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] GCC3.5 tree-ssa > On Wed, 24 Dec 2003,

why doesn't llvm transfer bytecode to RTL form? I mean the cross-platform compile in GCC. Could LLVM do that? maybe tree-ssa also create the representation with a testual format if needed. is it very difficalt? I want to know. BWT: if we port pthread library to llvm, what do we consider at first? yueqiang Chris Lattner wrote: >On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, yue wrote: > > >>what

On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, yue wrote: > we work on distribute software development, most programs are wroten in > java. > but the running speed of that is slowly, it requires thread library to > support, you know. I'm not sure exactly what you mean here. LLVM does not currently have a Java front-end, though there is one in development. Thread support should not be a problem, you can

On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, yue wrote: > why doesn't llvm transfer bytecode to RTL form? I mean the > cross-platform compile in GCC. Could LLVM do that? Sure, it would be a realtively straight-forward (but large and hard to get right, if you're not a GCC expert), project to build an LLVM front-end for GCC. This would allow you to effectively use LLVM as a mid-level representation for

we work on distribute software development, most programs are wroten in java. but the running speed of that is slowly, it requires thread library to support, you know. Chris Lattner wrote: >On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, yue wrote: > > > >>why doesn't llvm transfer bytecode to RTL form? I mean the >>cross-platform compile in GCC. Could LLVM do that? >> >>