search for: gcc2c

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "gcc2c".

Did you mean: gcc2
[LLVMdev] C back-end differences
2007 May 09
2
[LLVMdev] C back-end differences
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 11:58 -0700, Bill wrote: > On 5/8/07, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah <napi at axiomsol.com> wrote: > > How does the C back-end of LLVM differ from the one in gcc2c developed > > by SUN several years ago? > > > Hi Napi, > > For one, it converts LLVM's bytecode to C instead of GCC's RTL. It's > also under a different license. Hi Bill: Would it be easier to convert from LLVM's bytecode to C as opposed to from RTL? What...
[LLVMdev] C back-end differences
2007 May 08
1
[LLVMdev] C back-end differences
How does the C back-end of LLVM differ from the one in gcc2c developed by SUN several years ago? Thanks. Napi
[LLVMdev] C back-end differences
2007 May 09
0
[LLVMdev] C back-end differences
On May 8, 2007, at 10:05 PM, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah wrote: > On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 11:58 -0700, Bill wrote: >> On 5/8/07, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah <napi at axiomsol.com> wrote: >>> How does the C back-end of LLVM differ from the one in gcc2c >>> developed >>> by SUN several years ago? >>> >> Hi Napi, >> >> For one, it converts LLVM's bytecode to C instead of GCC's RTL. It's >> also under a different license. > > Hi Bill: > > Would it be easier to convert from...
[LLVMdev] C++ to C
2006 Nov 20
2
[LLVMdev] C++ to C
Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah wrote: > On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 11:43 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote: > >> On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, John Criswell wrote: >> >>> I don't think you will need to deal with any names. The C++ standard >>> library has already been compiled to LLVM bytecode (it is part of the >>> llvm-gcc/llvm-g++ distribution). If you use
[LLVMdev] C back-end differences
2007 May 08
0
[LLVMdev] C back-end differences
On 5/8/07, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah <napi at axiomsol.com> wrote: > How does the C back-end of LLVM differ from the one in gcc2c developed > by SUN several years ago? > Hi Napi, For one, it converts LLVM's bytecode to C instead of GCC's RTL. It's also under a different license. As far as code quality, I don't believe it's been compared. -bw
[LLVMdev] C back-end differences
2007 May 12
2
[LLVMdev] C back-end differences
...Wendling wrote: > On May 8, 2007, at 10:05 PM, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 11:58 -0700, Bill wrote: > >> On 5/8/07, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah <napi at axiomsol.com> wrote: > >>> How does the C back-end of LLVM differ from the one in gcc2c > >>> developed > >>> by SUN several years ago? > >>> > >> Hi Napi, > >> > >> For one, it converts LLVM's bytecode to C instead of GCC's RTL. It's > >> also under a different license. > > > > Hi Bill:...