Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "gcabl".
Did you mean:
gcal
2014 Jun 05
2
[LLVMdev] Code for late safepoint placement available
...ters and fat pointers (both of which are supported on our system in hardware). It would be nice, rather than hard-coding an address space, to have a property on DataLayout that would tell you if a specific address space contained GC pointers. We could then designate an address space that was both GCable and contained fat pointers, and another for non-GCable fat pointers.
Making this configurable is definitely desirable. I like your idea of
including a list of address spaces in data layout which contain GC
pointers and making that query-able. That sounds quite reasonable.
Unless anyone makes...
2014 Jun 04
4
[LLVMdev] Code for late safepoint placement available
As I've mentioned on the mailing list a couple of times over the last
few months, we've been working on an approach for supporting precise
fully relocating garbage collection in LLVM. I am happy to announce
that we now have a version of the code available for public view and
discussion.
https://github.com/AzulSystems/llvm-late-safepoint-placement
2014 Dec 05
9
[LLVMdev] Future plans for GC in LLVM
Now that the statepoint changes have landed, I wanted to start a
discussion about what's next for GC support in LLVM. I'm going to
sketch out a strawman proposal, but I'm not set on any of this. I
mostly just want to draw interested parties out of the woodwork. :)
Overall Direction:
In the short term, my intent is to preserve the functionality of the
existing code, but migrate