Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "gc_results".
2014 Jun 04
4
[LLVMdev] Code for late safepoint placement available
...eprecate the existing gcroot support and target it for
complete removal a couple of releases down the road..
* What programmatic interface should we present at the IR level and
where should it live? We're moving towards a CallSite like
interface for statepoints, gc_relocates, and gc_results call sites.
Is this the right approach? If so, should it live in the IR
subtree, or Support? (Note: The current code is only about 40%
migrated to the new interface.)
* To support invokable calls with safepoints, we need to make the
statepoint intrinsic invokable. This is new...
2014 Jun 05
2
[LLVMdev] Code for late safepoint placement available
...ly deprecate the existing gcroot support and target it for complete removal a couple of releases down the road..
>> • What programmatic interface should we present at the IR level and where should it live? We're moving towards a CallSite like interface for statepoints, gc_relocates, and gc_results call sites. Is this the right approach? If so, should it live in the IR subtree, or Support? (Note: The current code is only about 40% migrated to the new interface.)
>> • To support invokable calls with safepoints, we need to make the statepoint intrinsic invokable. This is new for intr...