search for: gbarnett

...g Frog Consultancy Ltd. > http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > -- Granville Barnett http://gbarnett.github.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090618/155b0703/attachment.html>

On Thursday 18 June 2009 12:28:57 Cory Nelson wrote: > I'm also curious what language uses this and why it is useful :) HLVM is intended to be a general-purpose VM rather than a particular language. > Also, things like this would make lock-free algorithms difficult or > impossible. True. Perhaps that is a good argument for providing both kinds. However, nulls are certainly more

Voor de duidelijkheid... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 16:14:37 -0500 From: gbarnett <gbarnett@satx.rr.com> To: guus@sliepen.warande.net Subject: TINC 1.0pre2: unable to access one private network Guus... I couldn't seem to get this to the mail list... could you post it and/or answer it for me? Thx. I have been having problems configuring TINC properly. SCENARIO: ---...

On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, gbarnett wrote: > Guus... I couldn't seem to get this to the mail list... could you post it > and/or answer it for me? Sure. > 2.3.4.5/tinc.conf > MyVirtualIP = 10.69.69.69/32 > TapDevice = /dev/tap0 > VPNMask = 255.255.255.0 Problem found (I think)! MyVirtualIP should be 10.69....

On Jun 16, 2009, at 1:05 PM, Granville Barnett wrote: > I'm more interested in whether or not there are any projects in the > works that fuse the tools together to build a better IDE experience. > I forget which presentation it was, but one of the developers (I > *think* it was the gentleman that presented something on CLANG at > the dev's conference 2008) made a bit

I'm more interested in whether or not there are any projects in the works that fuse the tools together to build a better IDE experience. I forget which presentation it was, but one of the developers (I *think* it was the gentleman that presented something on CLANG at the dev's conference 2008) made a bit of a point by saying that LLVM, unlike GCC has been built from the ground up with

...g Frog Consultancy Ltd. > http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > -- Granville Barnett http://gbarnett.github.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090618/cc43709d/attachment.html>

On Tuesday 16 June 2009 07:37:32 Talin wrote: > A while back there was a discussion thread about whether an accurate, > concurrent garbage collector could be "generic" in the sense of being > able to support multiple different languages efficiently. After having > done some work on this, I now believe that this is the case - using C++ > policy-based design principles, you

A while back there was a discussion thread about whether an accurate, concurrent garbage collector could be "generic" in the sense of being able to support multiple different languages efficiently. After having done some work on this, I now believe that this is the case - using C++ policy-based design principles, you can create a set of modules that represent different aspects of

Hi, We're using dovecot to provide pop3 for a number of mailboxes. The setup is pretty simple: Each user / domain has a mailstore in /data/mailstore/<domain>/<user>/Maildir (backed by NFS). Passwords are in simple passwd-file format in the top level domain directory eg: # cat /data/mailstore/foo.com/.passwd user:{plain}password The passdb setup looks like this. passdb {