search for: gateway0

...ance with the instructions obtained at: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Deployment_Guide/sec-networkscripts-static-routes-network-netmask-directives.html I added these directives to the route-eth0:192 file: ADDRESS0=192.168.6.9 NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 GATEWAY0=192.168.6.1 However, when I restart the network service I see this: service network restart Shutting down interface eth0: [ OK ] Shutting down loopback interface: [ OK ] Bringing up loopback interface: [ OK ] B...

...bond0 which enslaves eth0 + eth1 - br0 which attaches bond0 - xenbr0 - xenbr5 all of which are internal only networks (10.0.0.0; 10.1.1.0; etc) Br0 is used both for the host to access the outside world as well as DomUs acting as gateway machines for each xenbr network. For example the DomU named Gateway0 will have eth0 attached to br0 giving it connectivity to the Internet. Eth1 on Gateway0 will connect to an internal only-network, xenbr0, upon which will reside a bunch of other DomUs. The latter communicate with the outside world according to the NAT firewall rules running on Gateway0. Gateway1...

....cyberciti.biz/tips/configuring-static-routes-in-debian-or-red-hat-linux-systems.html >> >> where it says to add to ifcfg-eth0: >> >> 192.168.128.0/17 via 40.53.24.3 That?s only for RHEL 7: http://goo.gl/AtjIyI > ADDRESS0=192.168.128.0 > NETMASK0=255.255.128.0 > GATEWAY0=40.53.24.3 This is the scheme used in prior versions of RHEL.

...015 12:33, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:48 AM, James B. Byrne > <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: >> >>> I added these directives to the route-eth0:192 file: >>> >>> ADDRESS0=192.168.6.9 >>> NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 >>> GATEWAY0=192.168.6.1 >>> >> >> Which should have been: >> >> ADDRESS0=192.168.6.0 >> >> NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 >> GATEWAY0=192.168.6.1 >> > > But it still doesn't matter. Your netmask in the ifcfg- file already > covers that range and yo...

...or: an inet prefix is expected rather than "19/27"..2.0 Bringing up interface xenbr1: Error: either "to" is duplicate, or "192.168.2.3" is a garbage. "ringing up interface xenbr1: Cannot find device "xenbr1 route-xenbr1: #192.168.2.0/27 via 192.168.2.3 #GATEWAY0=192.168.2.3 #NETMASK0=255.255.255.224 #ADDRESS0=192.168.2.10 #default 192.168.2.3 dev xenbr1 192.168.2.0/27 via 192.168.2.3 dev xenbr1 (the commented out are from various tries, corresponding to the errors above) This is on a xen kernel. 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5xen Kai -- Kai Sch?tzl, Berlin, Ger...

On Thu, February 19, 2015 10:19, James B. Byrne wrote: > > I added these directives to the route-eth0:192 file: > > ADDRESS0=192.168.6.9 > NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 > GATEWAY0=192.168.6.1 > Which should have been: ADDRESS0=192.168.6.0 NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 GATEWAY0=192.168.6.1 Sigh. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca...

Hi, I'd want to configure persistent static routes, ie in config files, but I can't configure static routes, I tested: [root at centos7 ~]# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/routes-enp0s3 ADDRESS0=10.10.10.0 NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 GATEWAY0=192.168.1.1 logs says nothing: ago 27 15:38:29 centos7.vhgroup.corp NetworkManager[2299]: <info> Activation (enp0s3) Stage 5 of 5 (IPv4 Commit) complete. ago 27 15:38:29 centos7.vhgroup.corp NetworkManager[2299]: <info> (enp0s3): device state change: ip-check -> seconda...0 0] ago...

...twork-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 # Please read /usr/share/doc/initscripts-*/sysconfig.txt # for the documentation of these parameters. IPV6INIT=no ONBOOT=yes USERCTL=no PEERDNS=yes TYPE=Ethernet DEVICE=eth1 HWADDR=00:60:08:3e:0a:d1 BOOTPROTO=none NETMASK=255.255.255.0 IPADDR=192.168.1.1 and route-eth1 GATEWAY0=192.168.1.1 NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 ADDRESS0=192.168.1.0 When I run ifup eth1 , follow messages show me. ifup eth1 RTNETLINK answers: File exists When I run command route -n , follow messages show me. # route -n 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 169....

...2.6.11-1-686 and Asterisk CVS-Nv1-0-7-06/01/05-01:27:25. Server B does not have any Digium board, but has ztdummy and zaptel loaded. It's runnin on a P4 1.6Ghz with 1GB RAM and 36G SCSI RAID 10 on Gentoo 2.6.11-gentoo-r9 and Asterisk 1.0.7. The relevant section of iax.conf looks like: [gateway0] type=friend user=gateway0 secret=guess context=default host=10.0.10.199 trunk=yes notransfer=yes canreinvite=no disallow=all allow=ulaw When I dial from Server B thru Server A, I simply issue: Dial($ {GATEWA}/${EXTEN},,r), where ${GATEWAY} points to the IAX2 trunk information. The problem I h...

...ients but of course external routing falls apart. /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/rule-eth2 from 173.11.51.45 table Cable /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/rule-eth3 from 67.152.166.2 table T1 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-eth0 GATEWAY1=192.168.4.3 NETMASK1=255.255.255.0 ADDRESS1=192.168.6.0 GATEWAY0=192.168.4.2 NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 ADDRESS0=192.168.5.0 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-eth1 GATEWAY0=192.168.4.1 NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 ADDRESS0=192.168.4.0 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-eth2 173.11.51.44/30 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 173.11.51.45 table Cable 173.11.51.44/...

I know how to use 'ip' to set up a static route, e.g.: ip route add 192.168.128.0/17 via 40.53.24.3 dev eth0 But if you reboot or restart network, you loose this. Thus you have to make it persistant. I found: http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/configuring-static-routes-in-debian-or-red-hat-linux-systems.html where it says to add to ifcfg-eth0: 192.168.128.0/17 via 40.53.24.3 But this

...-hat-linux-systems.html > > where it says to add to ifcfg-eth0: > > 192.168.128.0/17 via 40.53.24.3 > Create the file /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-eth0 Add the following for each static route, incrementing the numeric for each: ADDRESS0=192.168.128.0 NETMASK0=255.255.128.0 GATEWAY0=40.53.24.3 > But this did not work after the interface was restarted. So what is the > proper to set up persistant static routes? > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo...

...add to ifcfg-eth0: >>> >>> 192.168.128.0/17 via 40.53.24.3 > > That?s only for RHEL 7: http://goo.gl/AtjIyI Aside from being irritating, that's just wrong. I'm using that syntax on Centos5, >> ADDRESS0=192.168.128.0 >> NETMASK0=255.255.128.0 >> GATEWAY0=40.53.24.3 > > This is the scheme used in prior versions of RHEL. I think both types of syntax will work in all versions. The GUI tools do the latter form. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com

Hello List, I have one network card and added two IP-Adresses to it: eth1 192.168.1.1/24 eth1:1 10.1.2.3/24 a want to use static routes on device eth1:1 and added one in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-eth1:1: GATEWAY0=10.1.2.4 ADDRESS0=10.2.2.0 NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 What the network-script should execute in background is: ip route add 10.2.2.0/24 via 10.1.2.4 dev eth1 but it executes ip route add 10.2.2.0/24 via 10.1.2.4 dev eth1:1 BUT: "eth1:1" is in the "ip" command not working, "i...

Hi, I'm working with the iproute2/iptables toolset on my CentOS4 server to create custom routing rules. However, I'm a bit at a loss how to create these permanently so that they are automatically reloaded upon reboot of the server. I know that iptables has a config file in /etc/sysconfig/iptables that is loaded by /etc/init.d/iptables startup script. Is there anything that works

On 13 February 2017 at 16:17, peter.winterflood <peter.winterflood at ossi.co.uk> wrote: > > > > there's a really good solution to this. > > yum remove NetworkManager* > > chkconfig network on > > service network start > > and yes thats all under fedora 25, and centos 7. > > works like a charm. > > sometimes removing NM leaves resolv.conf

...for that, article, this next bug had caught me, on an older build , now its fixed, but the fix did not go and backfix a broken config. When transitioning from NetworkManager to using the network initscript, the default gateway parameter in the interface's ifcfg file will be depicted as 'GATEWAY0'. In order for the ifcfg file to be compatible with the network initscript, this parameter must be renamed to 'GATEWAY'. This limitation will be addressed in an upcoming release of RHEL7. one to watch out for on the removing NM, plus the resolv.conf one. Anyway, for anyone else, ma...

...yntax on Centos5, AH, I think I see what I did wrong. I put that line in the ifcfg-eth0 when according to this page, it goes in the route-eth0 just like the old format. I will give that a try tomorrow... > >>> ADDRESS0=192.168.128.0 >>> NETMASK0=255.255.128.0 >>> GATEWAY0=40.53.24.3 >> This is the scheme used in prior versions of RHEL. > I think both types of syntax will work in all versions. The GUI tools > do the latter form. >

Is it possible to have a route stick in the kernel, even if device it points to goes to roller coaster up and down drive. For example. I have an ADSL modem and am doing VPN over it. There's a route needed for VPN added like this: ip route add 192.168.1.0/24 via 1.2.3.4 src 192.168.2.1 There are two problems with it: a) if ADSL link is down when above command is executed, the route

...s next bug had caught me, on an older build > , now its fixed, but the fix did not go and backfix a broken config. > > When transitioning from NetworkManager to using the network initscript, > the default gateway parameter in the interface's ifcfg file will be > depicted as 'GATEWAY0'. In order for the ifcfg file to be compatible > with the network initscript, this parameter must be renamed to > 'GATEWAY'. This limitation will be addressed in an upcoming release of > RHEL7. > > one to watch out for on the removing NM, plus the resolv.conf one. >...