search for: garious

...o down. :) -Greg On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Steven Noonan <steven at uplinklabs.net> wrote: > Someone should enable the smart HTTP protocol: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-http-backend.html > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: >>> LLVM has its own mirror at http://llvm.org/git/llvm.git, if that suits your needs. >> >> The llvm.org mirror seems to be quite a bit slower (~3.5x). I think >> it's because github lets me use the git protocol whereas llvm.org >> sugg...

You can email the list, what url says that? -Chris > On Jan 20, 2015, at 9:31 AM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: > > Ping > >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: >> I am not a member of the llvm-admin email list and on the description >> of that page it says, "DO NOT MAIL THIS LIST!" So how do we...

...#39;m asked for a password for user 'git'. -Greg On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > LLVM has its own mirror at http://llvm.org/git/llvm.git, if that suits your > needs. > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> It's been 4 days since Github's llvm mirror has been updated. Anybody >> know who maintains this? >> >> https://github.com/llvm-mirror >> >> Thanks, >> Greg >> ______________________________________________...

...RST_32_SECOND_64(1216, 2304); with const uptr kThreadDescriptorSize = FIRST_32_SECOND_64(1168, 2304); The tests should pass after that. I need to figure out which ifdefs to put this under, so I might not be able to land the fix until Monday. On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: > > What version of glibc are you building with on x86? > > 2.11.1 for 64-bit x86 linux > > $ ldd --version > ldd (Ubuntu EGLIBC 2.11.1-0ubuntu7.8) 2.11.1 > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Sergey Matveev <earthdok at google.com> > wrot...

On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: >> But if you just want to see the code and the diff against upstream... > > If others are interested as well, here's all your changes via Github's > "compare" feature: > > https://github.com/garious/llvm/compare/master...chromium >...

Those changes shouldn't affect ARM at all, since everything is under #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__). What version of glibc are you building with on x86? On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: > The failures happen on x86 Linux, Ubuntu Lucid. On ARM Android, my > example code segfaults, whereas before it worked. I wasn't planning to > debug that though since there are unit test failures on x86 Linux. > > Greg > > On May 31, 2013, at 2:3...

...%ulimit -s 8192 %t? I like that idea. How do you feel about this short-term solution: %run sh -c "ulimit -s 8192 && %t" -Greg On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis at google.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: >>> execv(argv[0]) is a canonical way to restart the >>> process, it's sad that the emulator interferes with that. >> >> We have the option to emulate the instruction set or emulate the OS. >> The former is lighter weight and easy to c...

...> > const uptr kThreadDescriptorSize = FIRST_32_SECOND_64(1168, 2304); > > The tests should pass after that. I need to figure out which ifdefs to put > this under, so I might not be able to land the fix until Monday. > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > What version of glibc are you building with on x86? >> >> 2.11.1 for 64-bit x86 linux >> >> $ ldd --version >> ldd (Ubuntu EGLIBC 2.11.1-0ubuntu7.8) 2.11.1 >> >> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Sergey Matveev...

...d my binaries and arm-linux-androideabi-addr2line? Thanks, Greg P.S. Thanks for the colorful output. You make address sanitizing feel like Christmas. On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com>wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com>wrote: > >> For me, UBsan fails with clang 3.2 and passes with clang 3.3. >> > > Cool, can you use clang 3.3 then? :) I think that the reason selected > UBSan tests fail under clang 3.2 is a bug in Clang, which was fixed > (Richard may correct me if I'...

...ev <earthdok at google.com> wrote: > Those changes shouldn't affect ARM at all, since everything is under #if > defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__). > > What version of glibc are you building with on x86? > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> The failures happen on x86 Linux, Ubuntu Lucid. On ARM Android, my >> example code segfaults, whereas before it worked. I wasn't planning to >> debug that though since there are unit test failures on x86 Linux. >> >> Greg >&...

...vested interested in switching to a DVCS. What I find most interesting is that Git support is so high despite the GettingStarted page encouraging the use of SVN and referring to Git as just a mirror. -Greg On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:52 AM, <dag at cray.com> wrote: > Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> writes: > >> I'm curious to know if the LLVM community is deeply split when it >> comes to version control. If you have a second, could you please >> vote? >> >> http://poll.pollcode.com/i597kq > > Thanks Greg. > > The last option i...

Ah, sometimes things get lost. How about resubmitting the patch and cc'ing me and grosbach at apple.com? Thanks! -eric On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: > Yep, b.w using ARM's "alternative syntax" is broken. Luckily, though LLVM > bitcode doesn't compile to this form, and will always use a label instead. > Here's a patch that only acknowledges the broken instructions: > > > https://...

On 17 October 2012 22:23, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: > I had to move MCELF.h to "include/llvm/MC" and added a > MCELFStreamer.h to the same directory. That okay to do? This is not a trivial question, and I'll let others chip in. Superficially, you'd think so and it might make sense in the long run, b...

...8 support". Thanks, Greg On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com>wrote: > > On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Evgeniy Stepanov < > eugeni.stepanov at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > When I build compiler-rt with clang 3.2, all lsan tests pass. The only >> > failing tests I see are in ubsan: >> > >> > Failing Tests (6): >> > UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer :: Float/cast-overflow.cpp >> >...

I'm hoping to revive the LLD standalone CMake build. I'm new to this build but it looks like it borrowed code from an old version of compiler-rt, which I did some work on last year. Like compiler-rt, I'd like to get the LLD build up running with only CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH instead of defining custom variables like LLD_PATH_TO_LLVM_BUILD and LLD_PATH_TO_LLVM_SOURCE. Any objection to that?

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: > > Cool, can you use clang 3.3 then? :) > > I can, but digging deeper I see that the compiler-rt sanitizer tests > depend on just-built-clang for its object instrumentation. The next time > the instrumentation changes, I'd expect those tests to break...

...ds compiler-rt with just-built Clang. > There are other benefits, like keeping sanitizers code "-Werror"-clean under the fresh Clang, ability to catch regressions in compiler etc. Why would you need a fixed version? > > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: >> Okay, dropping gcc 4.4.3 makes sense. How do you feel about using clang 3.2 (and the upcoming 3.3) instead of tip-of-the-trunk clang? It looks like everything works great, but that you just need to make those UB tests 'unsupported' since they fail with &qu...

...build the X86 versions of the compiler-rt libraries. > Would be great if you could write one, though. ;) if only I knew what content to add :) -Greg On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 17 December 2013 22:09, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> http://llvm.org/docs/HowToCrossCompileLLVM.html >> >> Are there compiler-rt-specific instructions somewhere? > > > Not that I know of, and I always build compiler-rt natively, together with > Clang and LLVM. :( > > Would be gre...

...sad > that the emulator interferes with that. > > ulimit does not work for me because it needs to run on the device, in > the same shell as the test binary. > Propagating ulimit setting in %run wrapper sounds wrong. > > > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Evgeniy, >> >> This fix causes me trouble in the emulator because of the execv(argv[0]): >> >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140217/205359.html >> >> Instead using setrlimit from within the C++ c...

...SET(ANDROID "1" CACHE STRING "ANDROID" FORCE) SET(ANDROID_COMMON_FLAGS "-target arm-linux-androideabi --sysroot=${LLVM_ANDROID_TOOLCHAIN_DIR}/sysroot -B${LLVM_ANDROID_TOOLCHAIN_DIR} -mllvm -arm-enable-ehabi") On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: > Okay, dropping gcc 4.4.3 makes sense. How do you feel about using clang > 3.2 (and the upcoming 3.3) instead of tip-of-the-trunk clang? It looks > like everything works great, but that you just need to make those UB tests > 'unsupported' since they f...