Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "gareevroman".
2016 Jan 27
2
Skip redundant checks in AliasSet::aliasesUnknownInst
On 01/27/2016 07:53 AM, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 1:27 AM, Roman Gareev <gareevroman at gmail.com
> <mailto:gareevroman at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Thank you for the idea! Could you please explain it?
>
>
> Which part are you having trouble with, so i know where to concetrate?
>
> If I’m not
> mistaken, you advise to insert the unknown...
2015 Dec 12
2
Objects of MemoryLocation class are created for ‘llvm.memset.*‘ intrinsics
2015-12-11 23:44 GMT+05:00 Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov>:
> Hi Roman,
>
> The MemoryLocation objects are involved in findAliasSetForUnknownInst, but none are created there for the memset intrinsic. MemoryLocation objects are only involved for the regular memory accesses being compared to the unknown instruction. See AliasSet::aliasesUnknownInst in lib/Analysis/AliasSetTracker.cpp.
2016 Jan 27
2
Skip redundant checks in AliasSet::aliasesUnknownInst
Thank you for the idea! Could you please explain it? If I’m not
mistaken, you advise to insert the unknown insts of an every AS from
AliasSetTracker::add(const AliasSetTracker &AST) into a smallptrset
and consequently append it to merged alias sets from
AliasSetTracker::findAliasSetForUnknownInst. I think that Philip
proposed something similar to your approach in
2016 Jan 12
2
greendragon build noisy due to mmap_stress.cc
...(afaiu).
Best,
Tobias
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: ** <llvm.greendragon at gmail.com <mailto:llvm.greendragon at gmail.com>>
Date: 2016-01-13 0:00 GMT+05:00
Subject: Clang Stage 1: cmake, RA, using system compiler (Check) - Build
# 9557 - Failure!
To: Roman Gareev <gareevroman at gmail.com <mailto:gareevroman at gmail.com>>,
Simon Atanasyan <simon at atanasyan.com <mailto:simon at atanasyan.com>>,
Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com <mailto:tejohnson at google.com>>,
Sanjay Patel <spatel at rotateright.com <mailto:spatel at rota...
2016 May 16
2
Determination of statements that contain only matrix multiplication
Hi Tobias,
could we use information about memory accesses of a SCoP statement and
def-use chains to determine statements, which don’t contain matrix
multiplication of the following form?
for (int i = 0; i < Upper Bound1; i++)
for (int j = 0; j < Upper Bound2; j++)
for (int k = 0; k < Upper Bound3; j++)
C[i][j] += A[i][k] * B[k][j]
We could probably check that memory access
2016 May 17
4
Determination of statements that contain only matrix multiplication
On 05/17/2016 01:47 PM, Michael Kruse wrote:
> 2016-05-16 19:52 GMT+02:00 Roman Gareev <gareevroman at gmail.com>:
>> Hi Tobias,
>>
>> could we use information about memory accesses of a SCoP statement and
>> def-use chains to determine statements, which don’t contain matrix
>> multiplication of the following form?
>
> Assuming s/don't/do you want to pa...
2016 May 31
0
[GSoC 2016] [Polly] Implementation of tiling, interchanging and unrolling of specific loops based on the algorithm for the analytical modeling
Hi Roman,
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Roman Gareev <gareevroman at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> I think that we could split a patch that contains an implementation of
> tiling, interchanging and unrolling of specific loops into three
> separate patches:
>
> 1. The first one adds a class that describes a processor model. It
> al...
2016 May 31
2
[GSoC 2016] [Polly] Implementation of tiling, interchanging and unrolling of specific loops based on the algorithm for the analytical modeling
Hi Tobias,
I think that we could split a patch that contains an implementation of
tiling, interchanging and unrolling of specific loops into three
separate patches:
1. The first one adds a class that describes a processor model. It
also adds a new command line parameter that contains all necessary
parameters of a target architecture, which are used to construct
objects of the class.
2. The