Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "gamesfromwithin".
2008 Dec 26
1
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Adding unit tests to LLVM
Hi Talin,
I just got around to looking at this. Sorry for the delay.
I like the idea of unit tests *A LOT*. Adequate testing has been a
major sticking point for LLVM for a long time. In my opinion, once the
color of the bike shed is agreed upon ;-), this will be a welcome
addition. I have never worked with Google's unit testing infrastucture
so I don't know how it works or if its
2008 Dec 27
0
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Adding unit tests to LLVM
Just a curiosity question, why push for gtest vs Boost Test or a
different test suite?
I normally use Boost, and their test suite, so I'm more familiar with
that. So I was wondering is one better then the other, or is it just
that someone makes a patch for it?
Regards
Mark Kromis
On Dec 27, 2008, at 12:26 AM, Keir Mierle wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Misha
2008 Dec 27
3
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Adding unit tests to LLVM
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Misha Brukman <brukman at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 22, 7:34 pm, Talin <viri... at gmail.com> wrote:
> > (Forwarding this to llvm-dev)
> >
> > This patch adds a unit test framework to LLVM, along with a sample unit
> test
> > for DenseMap. I don't expect this patch to be accepted as-is, this is
> mainly
> > a
2008 Dec 28
1
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Adding unit tests to LLVM
2008/12/27 Mark Kromis <greybird at mac.com>
> So are you planning on maintaining whatever test system, or just have them
> as a pre-requisite. For example are you going to have the gtest
> incorporated, or have them install it separately first? I was under the
> impression that the user would have to install gtest first.
>
The current plan is to check in the unittest
2008 Dec 28
4
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Adding unit tests to LLVM
...become
quite familiar with gtest's features, which made it a natural choice for
me. I presume that other testing frameworks will have their own
defenders on this list, and I am certainly willing to listen to what
they have to say.
The unit test comparison article mentioned earlier
(http://gamesfromwithin.com/?p=29) is a good starting point for
evaluating different unit test frameworks. Although gtest is too new to
have been mentioned in the article directly, if you actually compare
gtest's features against the various criteria used by the author of the
article, it comes off quite well.
Not...
2008 Dec 28
0
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Adding unit tests to LLVM
On Dec 27, 2008, at 7:41 PM, Misha Brukman wrote:
> 2008/12/27 Mark Kromis <greybird at mac.com>
> Just a curiosity question, why push for gtest vs Boost Test or a
> different test suite?
> I normally use Boost, and their test suite, so I'm more familiar
> with that. So I was wondering is one better then the other, or is it
> just that someone makes a patch for
2008 Dec 28
5
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Adding unit tests to LLVM
2008/12/27 Mark Kromis <greybird at mac.com>
> Just a curiosity question, why push for gtest vs Boost Test or
> a different test suite?
> I normally use Boost, and their test suite, so I'm more familiar with that.
> So I was wondering is one better then the other, or is it just that someone
> makes a patch for it?
>
I looked more into Boost.Test to see what's in