search for: gallati

Hi I want to block the IP traffic between any 2 hosts on a switched ethernet LAN. Will setting all the possible IP addresses on a linux machine in the LAN do the trick or there is another easier solution? -- Anton Glinkov network administrator _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO:

Hello list, I''m having a little trouble imagining a setup I''ll soon have. I am in the process of getting a routed /28 to my homeLAN. What I want to do is to put a linux box in front of the lan to filter some of the unneeded and potential dangerous ports. Now the box has 2 nics, one for the inside one for the outside. How should I go on to setup those NICs when a) the PCs in

Hello, I want to share/split bandwidth on a link with unknown bandwidth. I want to exactly share/split bandwidth (for example : FTP 30% , HTTP 20% or 30% for a group of PCs and so forth.) "Traffic-Control-HOWTO" talk that PRIO scheduler is an ideal match for "Handling a link with a variable (or unknown) bandwidth". But PRIO scheduler can not exactly share/split

Hello all, I am trying out version 2.3RC3 but it seems it has the same bug as all versions before (including 2.2 KH9 which I used last) When trying to relay an on-demand stream with icecast and also limiting, I always find that icecast counts completely wrong. The first listener is not counted, but icecast connects to the master server, gets the stream and relays. If a second client

Greetings, me again. I''m starting to feel miff now. If I have a few vpn tunnels with different tun interfaces. And all this tunnel traffic is coming in on my eth0 interface, it also leave via eth0 again. I would like to share the available bandwidth evenly with tunnel clients. Would applying the bandwidth rule on eth0 with htb & sfq work for sharing the bandwidth or will

So far I have been used to using linux to provide simple routing from my network to others using commands such as ip route add 192.168.1.0/24 via 192.168.0.4 etc and it has all worked perfectly. I also use smoothwall GPL to provice vpn services, however I have hit on a problem and am not at all clear on the way in which to proceed. I now need to provide a route to services, the access to these

Hi! I answer to two messages from this thread (I use digest). lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl wrote: > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:51:37 -0700 (PDT) > From: ibro tj <ibb_linux@yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: [LARTC] QoS for Voip. > To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl, alessandro.ren@opservices.com.br > > Hi, > > the hint from Martin A Brown which I am

I have three ADSL lines that I''d like to use as one big pipe to the internet. The ADSL service works by establishing a pppoe connection (the ADSL "modem" is a bridge), and each pppoe interface gets its own IP address. This means I''d have to have 4 ethernet interfaces (3 for each of the ADSL modems and 1 for the LAN) in my gateway. I''d setup the gateway to NAT

On Sun, 2005-09-18 at 18:07, Rene Gallati wrote: > Hello all, > > I am trying out version 2.3RC3 but it seems it has the same bug as all > versions before (including 2.2 KH9 which I used last) > > When trying to relay an on-demand stream with icecast and also limiting, > I always find that icecast counts completely...

Greetings, I want to setup bandwidth restrictions for a few clients that use openvpn to connect to my server. I''m using iptables to mark the packets in the mangle table (PRE/POSTROUTING) on eth0 before they get sent via the tunnel. Will the mark survive even if the packets then get routed via an openvpn tunnel (tunX) out the box or does openvpn change it removing the mark ? damnit,

Hi, I am not sure if this problem has already being posted, but I haven''t found any solution. Excuse me if it''s a repost but would appreciate any pointers. I have newly configured Multipath default route. I have 1 local connection and 4 internet connections. I am using kernel 2.6.7 and have applied Julian''s relevent patches. When the next hop is down,

The recent thread titled: working ftp shaping, i think provided a script example where 100Mbps was specified as the rate for a typical NIC. If that NIC is connected to a switch, chances are that it runs at 100Mbps in each direction concurrently - duplexed Writing a rule that specifies a 100Mbps rate and thereby a 100Mbps ceil, limits the connection to half the available bandwidth. I

Hello list, I am trying to solve a problem and after unsucessfully chasing forums and google for some hours, I turn to you in hope of a solution. I feel it's just a configuration issue but I just can't get my head wrapped around it. The situation is basically this: I have an Asterisk connected to an Alcatel OmniPCX via SIP. Asterisk only ever does SIP and has no dedicated hardware