search for: gafd90f5a

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "gafd90f5a".

2017 Oct 10
5
Tripplite Smart Int 1000 - wrong numbers
Charles, maybe we are getting closer :-) > The tripplite_serial_protocol branch has some debug statements that will show up if you run "sudo drivers/tripplite -D -a name-of-ups" from the nut directory. Network UPS Tools - Tripp-Lite SmartUPS driver 0.91 (2.7.4-432-gafd90f5a) ?? 0.000000??? [D1] debug level is '1' ?? 0.177766??? [D1] W value = 0x86 ?? 0.177782??? [D1] L value = 0x45 ?? 0.177786??? [D1] V value = 0x01 ?? 0.177790??? [D1] X value = 0x0000 Detected Tripp Lite Smart 1000 on /dev/ttyS0
2017 Oct 10
0
Tripplite Smart Int 1000 - wrong numbers
...re getting closer :-) > >> The tripplite_serial_protocol branch has some debug statements that will >> show up if you run "sudo drivers/tripplite -D -a name-of-ups" from the nut >> directory. >> > Network UPS Tools - Tripp-Lite SmartUPS driver 0.91 (2.7.4-432-gafd90f5a) > 0.000000 [D1] debug level is '1' > 0.177766 [D1] W value = 0x86 > 0.177782 [D1] L value = 0x45 > 0.177786 [D1] V value = 0x01 > 0.177790 [D1] X value = 0x0000 > Detected Tripp Lite Smart 1000 on /dev/ttyS0 > > > > ______________...
2017 Oct 11
0
Tripplite Smart Int 1000 - wrong numbers
...: > > Charles, maybe we are getting closer :-) >> The tripplite_serial_protocol branch has some debug statements that will show up if you run "sudo drivers/tripplite -D -a name-of-ups" from the nut directory. > Network UPS Tools - Tripp-Lite SmartUPS driver 0.91 (2.7.4-432-gafd90f5a) > 0.000000 [D1] debug level is '1' > 0.177766 [D1] W value = 0x86 > 0.177782 [D1] L value = 0x45 > 0.177786 [D1] V value = 0x01 > 0.177790 [D1] X value = 0x0000 Hmm, I was hoping to see some numbers in V that matched the format of the V command...
2017 Oct 09
3
Tripplite Smart Int 1000 - wrong numbers
Hi, Charles I'm trying compilation but there is no configure command in the cloned git directory of nut. D?a 08.10.2017 o 23:47 Charles Lepple nap?sal(a): > On Oct 8, 2017, at 4:34 PM, tuharsky at misbb.sk wrote: >> Thank You for You reply, Charles >> >> >> D?a 07.10.2017 o 14:30 Charles Lepple nap?sal(a): >>> Is the "lan4.1" cable different