search for: gabrielcorneanu

...o reuse an encoder, you’ll need to overwrite all state variables, and I don’t see how that could be much faster than simply allocating them anew. Perhaps you could allocate groups of encoders at once, if that would speed the process. > > > On Feb 1, 2018, at 4:29 AM, Gabriel Corneanu <gabrielcorneanu at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello all >> >> I am using libFLAC in a corner application, compressing a lot of small signals. >> First is a general question: in our application we have signals in range 5-10 MHz, potentially 40MHz! Is there any potential problem with that?? The...

...sting way to avoid having the encoder create the Vorbis comment metadata, but there might be a way to delete that particular metadata before the file is saved. A closer look at how metaflac creates a file without Vorbis comments should help. Brian On Feb 4, 2018, at 6:23 AM, Gabriel Corneanu <gabrielcorneanu at gmail.com> wrote: > The problem is really as I wrote: > 1. Metaflac is no option for me, I use libFLAC.dll > 2. There is no way (at least how I read the code) to avoid saving > comment with libFLAC; I would appreciate an extra option to avoid it, > which can default to old beha...

Hello all I am using libFLAC in a corner application, compressing *a lot* of small signals. First is a general question: in our application we have signals in range 5-10 MHz, potentially 40MHz! Is there any potential problem with that?? The mac sample rate is limited in flac, but it doesn't really seem to be a problem. The output is stored as blob in a sqlite database, it *never *needs to be

...low? In order to reuse an encoder, you’ll need to overwrite all state variables, and I don’t see how that could be much faster than simply allocating them anew. Perhaps you could allocate groups of encoders at once, if that would speed the process. On Feb 1, 2018, at 4:29 AM, Gabriel Corneanu <gabrielcorneanu at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all > > I am using libFLAC in a corner application, compressing a lot of small signals. > First is a general question: in our application we have signals in range 5-10 MHz, potentially 40MHz! Is there any potential problem with that?? The mac sample rate...

...encoder, you’ll need to overwrite all state variables, and I don’t see how that could be much faster than simply allocating them anew. Perhaps you could allocate groups of encoders at once, if that would speed the process. >> >> >> On Feb 1, 2018, at 4:29 AM, Gabriel Corneanu <gabrielcorneanu at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hello all >>> >>> I am using libFLAC in a corner application, compressing a lot of small signals. >>> First is a general question: in our application we have signals in range 5-10 MHz, potentially 40MHz! Is there any potential problem...

Hi, On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 10:10 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: > Gabriel Corneanu wrote: > >> Is this interesting for the project? > > I would theoretically accept a patch that allows direct access to the > functionality you seek, as long as it doesn't change the existing API. > >> If yes, how should I share it? As a patch against

Hello again, After some time, I succeeded in splitting "flush" and "restart" functions. A quick measurement gives me ~25% speed improvement, which is quite a lot. Of course this optimization is specific for this use case (many short signals). Is this interesting for the project? I would gladly contribute it... If yes, how should I share it? As a patch against current git?