search for: g5s

...base upon BYE from either side. I know that if exit handler hangs around too long, Bad Things (tm) will happen. Oddly, under load (60-100 B2BUA calls), the G7s start complaining: Autodestruct on dialog '<CALLID>' with owner in place (Method: BYE) I/O wait is actually higher on the G5s, the G7s have fancy disk cache cards and never get above 1% i/o wait turn off the tcpdump process on the G7s and Autodestruct warnings go away. The G7s should have much more capacity than the G5s but we never, ever get Autodestruct ... Method: BYE on the G5s. OS is identical CentOS in both cases...

Greetings LLVM Developers, My name is Kazuo, I’m the head of the largest Silicon Graphics IRIX community on the internet. I’m approaching this mailing list to see if any MIPS developers who hang out here are interested in developing the LLVM/Clang Compiler system for IRIX. There’s a growing need as GCC removed support for us from 4.8, over six years ago and since then we’ve absolutely languished

I have 10 machines in my office. A Linux server. Mostly Windows clients. And a couple of Mac G5s. Can anyone give me an informed opinion about the best way to access a Linux file server from the G5 Macs? They're running the latests OS X 10.3 (Panther). I'm using Mandrake 10 (based on the 2.6.3 kernel with Samba 3.0.2). So far I have only tried using smb/cifs from the Macs. I'm...

...to find a solution yet. I'm having transfer performance issues from various clients to my new file server : Server config is : Athlon 3200+ on Nforce 2 Yukon Gb NIC Gentoo with 2.6.9 samba 3.0.7-r1 ebuild 3Ware Escalade 9500S-12 x 2 Clients are XP SP2,2K3 on similar hardware and G5s with OS X 10.3, all with Gb NICs on Cat6, and all of which are transferring like dogs ;( smbmount from server to 2003Server transfers ok, but one directory with ~2500 files appears as empty! Also, my old G4 w/Os X 10.2 is transferring ok also... go figure. # hdapram -t /dev/sda1 /dev/sda1...

On Jun 11, 2012, at 9:30 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > I'm considering writing more-detailed itineraries for some PowerPC CPUs > that use the 'traditional' instruction grouping scheme. In essence, > this means that multiple instructions will stall in some pipeline stage > until a complete group is formed, then all will continue. > > I expect to

I'm considering writing more-detailed itineraries for some PowerPC CPUs that use the 'traditional' instruction grouping scheme. In essence, this means that multiple instructions will stall in some pipeline stage until a complete group is formed, then all will continue. I expect to provide CPU-specific code to help determine when the currently-waiting instructions would form a group.

...mplished within the normal framework, then that would be great. I think that I'll try ignoring the issue for now, just use a normal itinerary with bottom-up scheduling, and then the existing top-down pass (which attempts to enforce some of the ordering constraints (which are most severe on the G5s)). If that gives unsatisfactory results, then we can think about something more involved. Thanks again, Hal > > -Andy -- Hal Finkel Postdoctoral Appointee Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory

Along the same lines as the last question - how can I get to functions like MakeOpenFile via Win32API? It doesn''t seem to be exported by msvcrt-ruby18. Possible? Or am I out of luck? Dan This communication is the property of Qwest and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have