Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "g3doc".
Did you mean:
doc
2019 Nov 15
4
MLIR landing in the monorepo
...e you are going to rewrite the mlir history anyway, you can
> probably delete accidentally checked in large files if any.
>
Good point, I checked and this is the largest file in the history of the
repo as far as I can tell:
https://github.com/joker-eph/llvm-project-with-mlir/blob/master/mlir/g3doc/includes/img/view-operation.svg
(155kB)
>
> * I don't know whether the file CONTRIBUTING.md is still appropriate,
> at least for the Code of Conduct, LLVM has its own version.
> * g3doc/ seems a very Google specific name. Does `docs/` work?
> * bindings/python/pybind.cpp - does...
2019 Sep 10
2
Google’s TensorFlow team would like to contribute MLIR to the LLVM Foundation
...MLIR doesn't lend itself to concrete semantic
> descriptions, though I would expect the affine dialect (and others) to
> have documentation on par with the LLVM IR.
Just last week I had to scout through the affine dialect "LangRef
<https://github.com/tensorflow/mlir/blob/master/g3doc/Dialects/Affine.md>"
for something, and I also felt that it is due for a refresh! It seemed a
bit more than just BNF though, do you have example of what you would like
to see expanded there?
And to be clear: the ambition should be that the dialects included in-tree
(in MLIR/LLVM) get some...
2019 Sep 09
5
Google’s TensorFlow team would like to contribute MLIR to the LLVM Foundation
Overall, I think it will be a good move.
Maintenance wise, I'm expecting the existing community to move into
LLVM (if not all in already), so I don't foresee any additional costs.
Though, Hal's points are spot on...
On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 18:47, Finkel, Hal J. via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 3. As a specific example of the above, the current development
2019 Sep 11
5
Google’s TensorFlow team would like to contribute MLIR to the LLVM Foundation
...>> descriptions, though I would expect the affine dialect (and others) to
> >> have documentation on par with the LLVM IR.
> >
> >
> > Just last week I had to scout through the affine dialect "LangRef
> > <https://github.com/tensorflow/mlir/blob/master/g3doc/Dialects/Affine.md
> >"
> > for something, and I also felt that it is due for a refresh! It seemed a
> > bit more than just BNF though, do you have example of what you would like
> > to see expanded there?
>
> I was referring to the base MLIR documentation with th...
2019 Sep 09
3
Google’s TensorFlow team would like to contribute MLIR to the LLVM Foundation
On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 22:22, Chris Lattner <clattner at google.com> wrote:
> Including a bunch of content, eg a full langref doc:
> https://github.com/tensorflow/mlir/blob/master/g3doc/LangRef.md
Thanks Chris, that looks awesome!
This one could perhaps be improved with time:
https://github.com/tensorflow/mlir/blob/master/g3doc/ConversionToLLVMDialect.md
Which I think was Hal's point. If we had a front-end already using it
in tree, we could be a bit more relaxed with the co...
2019 Jul 28
2
[RFC] A new multidimensional array indexing intrinsic
...red approach?
+mlir mailing list, even though I generally hate cross posting.
Have you been following what is happening on the MLIR side of the world? It directly supports multi-dimensional arrays with both value and buffer semantics (e.g. load <https://github.com/tensorflow/mlir/blob/master/g3doc/LangRef.md#load-operation>, store <https://github.com/tensorflow/mlir/blob/master/g3doc/LangRef.md#store-operation>, and DMA <https://github.com/tensorflow/mlir/blob/master/g3doc/LangRef.md#dma_start-operation> operations). It is specifically focused on solving these sorts of proble...
2019 Jul 24
6
[RFC] A new multidimensional array indexing intrinsic
Hi all,
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 16:14, Michael Kruse via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Mmmh, looks like Tim Northover is actively working on typeless/opaque
> pointers, e.g. https://reviews.llvm.org/D64203
Yep, I'm spending as much time as I can on the project. I think
there's not really much chance that it'll be required in this cycle
(i.e. when we fork
2019 Nov 15
5
MLIR landing in the monorepo
Hi,
(bcc: mlir at tensorflow.org FYI)
I am following-up on the integration of MLIR in LLVM as a subproject (Re:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-October/135687.html ).
We're aiming to integrate into the monorepo next month. Right now our
intent is for MLIR to live in a top-level directory in parallel to clang,
lldb, lld, etc.
Our top option for the integration is to perform a