search for: fyou

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "fyou".

Did you mean: fou
2004 Aug 06
1
Admin question[s]
...> > > If I leave 'ADMIN' out it let's me in with the password. So maybe my > > icecast.conf is wrong[?] > > [attached] BTW, this is not on a public machine, just my private "radio > > station" run on my lan. > > If what you mean is the stuf fyou posted before, that isn't the admin > console, but you're logged in as a source. > > jack. > > --- >8 ---- > List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ > icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ > To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'i...
2019 Mar 26
0
Discrepancy between is.list() and is(x, "list")
...surprised if the behavior doesn't go all the way back to whenever head.function was added. Before that head() on a function (likely) would have failed just like it still does on your reclassed function. Because, again, this is how S3 is supposed to behave when you give it the inputs you are. I fyou want your f class to hit function S3 methods, you need to do class(myfun) <- c("f", "function") Then everything will work. Best, ~G [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2004 Aug 06
2
Admin question[s]
Jack Moffitt wrote: I tried that and then it tells me 'bad password' but my password is set properly in icecast.conf. If I leave 'ADMIN' out it let's me in with the password. So maybe my icecast.conf is wrong[?] [attached] BTW, this is not on a public machine, just my private "radio station" run on my lan. Thanks Kevin > To answer your admin question,
2005 Jan 15
1
Guide to stripping Centos 3
I responded to a post in the Dell poweredge mailing list earlier today. My answer was off the top of my head, with a bit of experimentation. The content may be useful in the Cenyos context as well to admin's looking to strip the size of an install to the bare bones. Comment welcomed. Can anyone see any packages which I have missed? -- Russ Herrold ---------- Forwarded message
2019 Mar 26
4
Discrepancy between is.list() and is(x, "list")
If I can merge this thread with the one I started yesterday... > "If the object does not have a class attribute, it has an implicit class..." > which I take to mean that if an object does have a class attribute it does not also have an implicit class. > I think this is reasonable behavior. Consider the "Date" class, which stores values as "numeric": >