search for: fxxxxxx

...'-fno-reciprocal-math'?" I have to call that a compiler-bug. > > I agree with all you wrote above :) > But I’d add that a legitimate fix could be for the clang driver to issue an error (or a warning) saying “-fno-reciprocal-math” isn’t compatible with -ffast-math, disabling -fxxxxxx” (with xxxxx being one or the other ;)) I don’t want to add confusion, I feel I’m doing a bad job here somehow: I’m not saying we *should* do this (rejecting in the driver). So let’s just fix it! — Mehdi >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Nicolai Hähnle [ma...

On the plus side, I'm glad to see the conclusions of the last couple of posts. From Mehdi: > Hope this clarify where I see the direction going, and even if you don’t agree with my > reasoning, the conclusion should be satisfactory on your side :) I'd say that summarizes my thoughts on this well. And from Nicolai: > Right. I'm not fundamentally opposed to having these