search for: fwiw2

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "fwiw2".

Did you mean: fwiw
2010 Oct 29
2
[LLVMdev] Landing my new development on the trunk ...
...Thus, it is not known until the algorithm is done, which of the created induction variables are unused. FWIW I noticed that other optimizations (as seen in StandardPasses.h) are followed by -instcombine for cleanup. I thought requiring or suggesting running -instcombine after -osr would be SOP. FWIW2 our intent in creating OSR was not to replace LSR, just provide an alternative strength reduction optimization. > -Eli Brian
2010 Oct 29
0
[LLVMdev] Landing my new development on the trunk ...
...izations (as seen in StandardPasses.h) are > followed by -instcombine for cleanup. I thought requiring or suggesting > running > -instcombine after -osr would be SOP. Strength reduction is sort of a special case; it runs extremely late because it interferes with other optimizations. > FWIW2 our intent in creating OSR was not to replace LSR, just provide an > alternative strength reduction optimization. Sure, but if it can't be used as an alternative to LSR, how would it be used? -Eli
2010 Oct 29
3
[LLVMdev] Landing my new development on the trunk ...
...s.h) are >> followed by -instcombine for cleanup. I thought requiring or suggesting >> running >> -instcombine after -osr would be SOP. > > Strength reduction is sort of a special case; it runs extremely late > because it interferes with other optimizations. > >> FWIW2 our intent in creating OSR was not to replace LSR, just provide an >> alternative strength reduction optimization. > > Sure, but if it can't be used as an alternative to LSR, how would it be used? The PACE project intends to use LLVM to perform lower level optimizations in its com...
2010 Oct 29
0
[LLVMdev] Landing my new development on the trunk ...
...-instcombine for cleanup. I thought requiring or suggesting >>> running >>> -instcombine after -osr would be SOP. >> >> Strength reduction is sort of a special case; it runs extremely late >> because it interferes with other optimizations. >> >>> FWIW2 our intent in creating OSR was not to replace LSR, just provide an >>> alternative strength reduction optimization. >> >> Sure, but if it can't be used as an alternative to LSR, how would it be used? > > The PACE project intends to use LLVM to perform lower level &...