search for: fuzi

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "fuzi".

Did you mean: fuz
2006 May 11
3
Loading GNOME with GDM
Hi, We have a few PC with CentOS 4 installed. By default, it runs to runlevel 5, which displays the GDM. I'm just wondering, how do I actually make the GDM to start GNOME automatically (after a successful login) for all normal user account without having to add 'exec gnome-session' in every user's ~/.xinitrc? The current scenario is, only successful 'root' logins starts
2009 Apr 29
3
GFS and Small Files
Hi all, We are running CentOS 5.2 64bit as our file server. Currently, we used GFS (with CLVM underneath it) as our filesystem (for our multiple 2TB SAN volume exports) since we plan to add more file servers (serving the same contents) later on. The issue we are facing at the moment is we found out that command such as 'ls' gives a very slow response.(e.g 3-4minutes for the outputs of ls
2007 Feb 24
1
Storage/SCSI Error on our CentOS server
Hi, Currently we are running CentOS 4.x on a 2-way Opteron machine. This machine, through a SCSI host adapter (Adaptec), is connected to a 2TB storage unit (an external RAID-5 disk array) Until our recent unintentional power trip, everything was fine and smooth. We have been experiencing complication accessing the storage ( it could be either intermittent filesystem error, partition could not be
2003 Oct 19
23
Notification
...18:55:15 +0000 (GMT) X-Original-To: samba@samba.org Delivered-To: samba@samba.org Received: from viefep11-int.chello.at (viefep11-int.chello.at [213.46.255.27]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D562C232 for <samba@samba.org>; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 18:54:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fuzi ([213.47.178.203]) by viefep11-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.5.01.05.17 201-253-122-126-117-20021021) with ESMTP id <20031019185440.ZTLG9654.viefep11-int.chello.at@fuzi> for <samba@samba.org>; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 20:54:40 +0200 From: "Markus Polly" <markus@p011y.at> To: &l...
2004 Sep 10
2
Blocking and compression.
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 23:44, Josh Coalson wrote: > Miroslav did some experiments with searching for optimum blocksize. > from what I remember it made at best a couple percent difference. > there was a thread about it here a while back. > Did his changes make it in? I can think of a coupla ways to approach this and I'd like to hear about what he tried. A couple of % doesnt seem
2004 Sep 10
4
Blocking and compression.
I did some research on patent claims on range and arithmetic coding. The original range code pdf presented in the UK by an ibm employee at the time asserts no patent claims what so ever. If there are patents I cant find em. I have the original paper in PDF if anyone cares to see it. Its a good candidate for encoding because browsing a few of the implememntations avaialable on line, I can roll my
2007 Mar 27
0
SCSI, SAS and FC Controller
Greetings, Currently, we have several Direct Attached Storage (DAS) units, connected to respective servers through Adaptec SCSI Controller. 1) Most of the time we used 80Mbit/s for external SCSI devices (in this case, the DAS itself). Is it true the maximum speed for external SCSI devices would be up to 80Mbit/s? Tried to change to 320Mbit/s but somehow the kernel crashed. Is there any specific