search for: futuresourc

...e mode to fix up the 2nd one and go on. However, Centos4 won't boot at all with a similar install attempt and running grub-install in rescue mode gives an error about not being able to find the bios drives. Is there a howto somewhere to work around this problem? -- Les Mikesell les at futuresource.com

Message I recieved from a work colleage.... Wonder if anyone can help the guy? --------FORWARDED MESSAGE---------------------- I finally ditched my freebsd and put centos on my box. Trouble is I can''t figure out how to get it to automount my USB and firewire (ipod) bits. Any ideas? Googling has left me a bit frustrated. No one seems to be able to do it. I have a /etc/fstab that

I want to mirror an existing 40GB data only drive using software Raid1 on my new CentOS 4 server. The existing drive is connected to a Promise Ultra 100 TX2 controller (non-raid). I have read about mdadm and understand how to create the Raid1 on /dev/mdxx devices. However I would like to know if the existing data on the orignal 40GB drive in the system will be destroyed when I create the raid with

...wappable drives so this becomes an interesting problem. However, it seems to be intended behavior so instead of reporting it as a bug, I'd like to know the correct procedure to prepare a drive to run in an unknown target machine and where this might be documented. -- Les Mikesell les at futuresource.com

...ased > To: Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dovecot at reub.net> > Cc: Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi>, Chris Wakelin > <c.d.wakelin at reading.ac.uk>, Jens Laas <jens.laas at data.slu.se>, > dovecot at dovecot.org > Message-ID: <1144844856.24974.1.camel at les-home.futuresource.com> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 06:51, Reuben Farrelly wrote: > >> That's why there's "scheduled downtime" and "after hours" to do >> these things, in >> case stuff goes wrong, as some users of horde with dove...

I'm new to RHEL-like distros. When, say, CentOS 4.1 is released, will it simply be CentOS 4.0 + released updates in new ISO images? Or is it more than just the updated packages integrated into the full distribution? Put another way, if my 4.0 installation is kept up to date with YUM, will I basically have a 4.1 installation? Thanks.

Greetings everyone. Let me preface this with the following, I know this is not specific to CentOS but I do value the input given by *many* of the users on this list. I can not think of a more appropriate place to ask these questions. Let me just break down my setup: 20 CentOS 4 servers, all running apache. The only things that are unique on each server are the network settings and the apache

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> > Does anything exist that has that 'basic logic'? The legacy forms > work and scale worldwide because the authority to use names is > carefully delegated. If two self-issued names are broadcast on > the same network, who wins? What if they are on different subnets > and can't see each other but you try to integrate

Anyone have any experience getting ghost to do a successful image with CentOS, Fedora, or RHEL? It worked great with RH9, but now a days I find it nearly impossible to get it to work properly. Any tips would be helpful. We spin up a large number of servers on a weekly basis and it would be nice to just be able to image them. Thanks, -Drew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hi, i am trying to compile the latest version of orca source code on CentOS 4.0 system running amd64 bit processor. I am getting the following error: make[5]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/orca-snapshot-r407/packages/rrdtool-1.0.49/perl-shared' cp RRDs.pm blib/lib/RRDs.pm cp ntmake.pl blib/lib/ntmake.pl /usr/bin/perl /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.5/ExtUtils/xsubpp -typemap

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of Johnny Hughes > Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 8:48 AM > To: CentOS ML > Subject: Re: [CentOS] web.vcs.u52.k12.me.us/linux/smbldap problems > > On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 09:41 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > I am perhaps going about this the hard way of

Hello list. I've just read this news (http://distrowatch.com/?newsid=02638) - in my opinion very good idea. What do you think? Regards.

Hi, I hope someone can help. Just started to play with software RAID on Centos 3.5 and was trying to simulate a faulty drive by using the -f switch on mdadm to mark the partition (drive) as faulty and I then I removed and readded the drive, which quit happily rebuilt according the /proc/mdstat and the output from the --detail switch of mdadm. After all this mucking around I shutdown the

Hah!!! This list is just too calm and mundane. The only thing we argue about is the ''announce'' list vs. the ''user'' list. ;) So, it''s springtime! I''m seeing all the regularly scheduled ''oil'' threads on my motorcycle lists and thought "oh what the heck, lets get the ''oil'' thread going over on the CentOS

I am used to sendmail and am using Postfix now and am uncertain of some features. I typically would comment out the line in sendmail.mc that went something like 'accept unresolvable domains' I tried using smtpd_sender_restrictions = reject_unverified_sender reject_unverified_smtp and this seems a bit too restrictive and got some bounces on legitimate senders so I'm

I''m still using CentOS 3.3 as our install mechanism, then adding some packages from a tarball of RPMs we need. Then I run # yum update yum which sometimes takes a while. Yesterday it took many hours. I like to run these from behind a firewall in our office before taking the server to the datacenter, but the delay meant a whole day''s delay in our trip to the datacenter

...r doesn't work. ------------------------------ Message: 19 Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2005 23:07:06 -0500 From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> Subject: Re: [CentOS] NFS sleepy woes To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Message-ID: <1120363625.11785.1.camel at les-home.futuresource.com> Content-Type: text/plain On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 22:08, Res wrote: > > > > CentOS-4 uses a 2.6.9-x kernel that is much better at doing what your > > BIOS says for power saving mode than 2.4 kernels were. I would first > > check the sleep settings in the BIOS of the...