search for: fuse_entry_cbk

...;client2' supports Extended attribute 2008-12-09 14:52:57 D [client-protocol.c:4763:client_protocol_reconnect] client1: breaking reconnect chain 2008-12-09 14:52:57 D [client-protocol.c:4763:client_protocol_reconnect] client2: breaking reconnect chain 2008-12-09 14:53:09 D [fuse-bridge.c:384:fuse_entry_cbk] glusterfs-fuse: 2: (34) / => 1 2008-12-09 14:53:09 W [fuse-bridge.c:398:fuse_entry_cbk] glusterfs-fuse: 2: (34) / => 1 Rehashing 0/0 2008-12-09 14:53:09 D [fuse-bridge.c:521:fuse_lookup] glusterfs-fuse: 3: LOOKUP /tmp2 2008-12-09 14:53:09 D [fuse-bridge.c:384:fuse_entry_cbk] glusterfs-fus...

...emote operation failed [Permission denied] [2018-01-15 17:35:05.139722] I [MSGID: 109069] [dht-common.c:1355:dht_lookup_unlink_of_false_linkto_cbk] 25-data-dht: lookup_unlink returned with op_ret -> -1 and op-errno -> 13 for /txt/file1.txt.bak [2018-01-15 17:35:05.139808] W [fuse-bridge.c:521:fuse_entry_cbk] 0-glusterfs-fuse: 568853127: LOOKUP() /txt/file1.txt.bak => -1 (Input/output error) Why gluster does unlink operation for renamed files? u2 doesn't have the write permission, so this operation fails, then we can see I/O error. However, since u2 has the read permission, u2 should have the r...

elbert at host1:~$ dpkg -l|grep glusterfs ii glusterfs-client 1.3.8-0pre2 GlusterFS fuse client ii glusterfs-server 1.3.8-0pre2 GlusterFS fuse server ii libglusterfs0 1.3.8-0pre2 GlusterFS libraries and translator modules I have 2 hosts set up to use AFR with

...001] [posix-acl.c:265:posix_acl_log_permit_denied] 0-posix-acl-autoload: client: -, gfid: 1c5d4bcc-84a3-4cf9-b4b2-9bba3ba2f75e, req(uid:1057,gid:513,perm:1,ngrps:2), ctx(uid:0,gid:0,in-groups:0,perm:700,updated-fop:LOOKUP, acl:-) [Permission denied] [2017-08-16 20:08:57.207733] W [fuse-bridge.c:471:fuse_entry_cbk] 0-glusterfs-fuse: 643111247: LOOKUP() /etc/samba/locks => -1 (Permission denied) [2017-08-16 20:08:57.536276] W [fuse-bridge.c:1067:fuse_setattr_cbk] 0-glusterfs-fuse: 643111420: SETATTR() /projects/ACTIVE/Automotive/MercedesBenz/AN Mercedes Benz of Miami/04 REVIT AND CAD/02 CD REVIT/2017-08-15...

...all the bricks were online. I saw this in the logs in the GlusterFS client after creating directory failure: [2017-11-06 11:55:18.420610] W [MSGID: 109011] [dht-layout.c:186:dht_layout_search] 0-data-dht: no subvolume for hash (value) = 4148753024 [2017-11-06 11:55:18.457744] W [fuse-bridge.c:521:fuse_entry_cbk] 0-glusterfs-fuse: 488: MKDIR() /xxx => -1 (Input/output error) The message "W [MSGID: 109011] [dht-layout.c:186:dht_layout_search] 0-data-dht: no subvolume for hash (value) = 4148753024" repeated 3 times between [2017-11-06 11:55:18.420610] and [2017-11-06 11:55:18.457731] -------...

...Type=glusterfs Options=defaults,acl,_netdev,negative-timeout=10,attribute-timeout=30,fopen-keep-cache,direct-io-mode=disable,fetch-attempts=5 [Install] WantedBy=multi-user.target This is in the log : /var/log/glusterfs/<gluster-volume>.log [2019-08-23 09:23:39.537151] W [fuse-bridge.c:939:fuse_entry_cbk] 0-glusterfs-fuse: 755327: LOOKUP() /path/desktop.ini => -1 (Keine Berechtigung) [2019-08-23 09:23:39.537803] W [fuse-bridge.c:939:fuse_entry_cbk] 0-glusterfs-fuse: 755330: LOOKUP() /path/desktop.ini => -1 (Keine Berechtigung) [2019-08-23 09:23:39.538232] W [fuse-bridge.c:1823:fuse_err_cbk] 0...

Hi, I have a ctdb cluster with 3 nodes and 3 glusterfs (version 6) nodes up and running. I observe plenty of these situations: A connected Windows-10 client doesn't react anymore. I use forder redirections.? - Smbstatus shows up some (auth in progress) processes. - In the logs of a ctdb node I get: Aug 23 10:12:29 ctdb-1 ctdbd[2167]: Ending traverse on DB locking.tdb (id 568831), records

...;ve experienced more and more input/output errors from my most write heavy gluster filesystem. The logfile on the gluster servers show nothing, but the client(s) that get the input/output errors (and timeouts) will as far as I can tell get errors such as : [2013-06-14 15:55:56] W [fuse-bridge.c:493:fuse_entry_cbk] glusterfs-fuse: LOOKUP(/369/60702093) inode (ptr=0x1efd440, ino=865790953174, gen=5881526961019962283) found conflict (ptr=0x21a8980, ino=865790953174, gen=5881526961019964013) I've enabled trace logging on a few clients and the attached file has an excerpt from one of the clients from when o...

...2-25 19:56:20.623404] W [dht-selfheal.c:882:dht_selfheal_directory] 0-adata-dht: 1 subvolumes have unrecoverable errors [2013-02-25 19:56:20.623413] E [dht-common.c:1372:dht_lookup] 0-adata-dht: Failed to get hashed subvol for /files/random-file.dat [2013-02-25 19:57:02.780965] W [fuse-bridge.c:292:fuse_entry_cbk] 0-glusterfs-fuse: 3960898: LOOKUP() /files/random-file.dat => -1 (Invalid argument) [2013-02-25 19:57:02.781385] W [dht-layout.c:186:dht_layout_search] 0-adata-dht: no subvolume for hash (value) = 2967408968 [2013-02-25 20:00:32.715869] I [dht-layout.c:593:dht_layout_normalize] 0-adata-dht: fou...

Did the logs provide any hints as to what the issue may be? Diego On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Diego Remolina <dijuremo at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for taking the time to look into this. Since we needed downtime > due to the gluster update, we also updated the OS, including samba. We > went from 4.2.x to 4.4.4 and many other packages for CentOS were > updated as well. OS

This looks like there could be some some problem requesting / leaking / whatever memory but without looking at the core its tought to tell for sure. Note: /usr/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0(_gf_msg_backtrace_nomem+0x78)[0x7f95bc54e618] Can you open up a bugzilla and get us the core file to review? -b ----- Original Message ----- > From: "???" <21291285 at qq.com> > To:

Hi, All, I used Infiniband to connect all GlusterFS nodes and the clients. Previously I run IP over IB and everything was OK. Now I used rdma transport mode instead. And then I ran the traffic. After I while, the glusterfs process exited because of segmentation fault. Here were the messages when I saw segmentation fault: pending frames: frame : type(0) op(0) frame : type(0) op(0)

Hi, I am the next scenario: ############################################################################# SERVER SIDE? (64 bit architecture) ?############################################################################# Two Storage Machines with: HARDWARE DELL PE2900 III Intel Quad Core Xeon E5420 2,5Ghz, 2x6Mb cache, Bus 1333FSB RAM 4 GB FB 667Mhz (2x2Gb) 8 HDD 1 TB, Near Line SAS 3,5"

...e are no such pointers on the other bricks. In our gluster log file I see the following error repeated [2012-02-24 13:58:15.507390] E [client3_1-fops.c:2228:client3_1_lookup_cbk] 0-gdata-client-2: remote operation failed: Structure needs cleaning [2012-02-24 13:58:15.507501] W [fuse-bridge.c:184:fuse_entry_cbk] 0-glusterfs-fuse: 176567027: LOOKUP() /projects/philex/PE/2010/Oct18/arch07/BalbacFull_250_200_03Mar_3.png => -1 (Structure needs cleaning) How do we fix this? Especially in general, since I don't know if there are other files in with this error, this is just the only one we have found so...

I've got configuration which in simple includes combination of afrs and unify - servers exports n[1-3]-brick[12] and n[1-3]-ns and client got cluster configuration: volume afr-ns type cluster/afr subvolumes n1-ns n2-ns n3-ns option data-self-heal on option metadata-self-heal on option entry-self-heal on end-volume volume afr1 type cluster/afr subvolumes n1-brick2

..._check_status] 0-test_vol-disperse-5: Operation failed on some subvolumes (up=7, mask=7, remaining=0, good=5, bad=2) [2018-02-02 11:24:46.657630] W [MSGID: 122002] [ec-common.c:71:ec_heal_report] 0-test_vol-disperse-5: Heal failed [Invalid argument] [2018-02-02 11:24:46.657892] W [fuse-bridge.c:470:fuse_entry_cbk] 0-glusterfs-fuse: 17: MKDIR() /111 => -1 (Invalid argument) [2018-02-02 11:24:55.295010] W [MSGID: 122053] [ec-common.c:116:ec_check_status] 0-test_vol-disperse-5: Operation failed on some subvolumes (up=7, mask=7, remaining=0, good=5, bad=2) [2018-02-02 11:24:55.295077] W [MSGID: 122002] [ec-c...

...is not connected] [2018-02-22 18:07:49.143219] W [MSGID: 114031] [client-rpc-fops.c:2938:client3_3_lookup_cbk] 2-scratch-client-1: remote operation failed. Path: /download (00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000) [Transport endpoint is not connected] [2018-02-22 18:07:49.143244] W [fuse-bridge.c:471:fuse_entry_cbk] 0-glusterfs-fuse: 790481: LOOKUP() /download => -1 (Transport endpoint is not connected) [2018-02-22 18:07:49.143247] E [rpc-clnt.c:365:saved_frames_unwind] (--> /lib64/libglusterfs.so.0(_gf_log_callingfn+0x192)[0x2b2ee5874752] (--> /lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(saved_frames_unwind+0x1de)[0x2b2ee5...