search for: funnames

Dear R-devel I have a function in a package that essentially provides a wrapper for a group of functions in another Suggested package (it sets appropriate defaults for the context, transforms output, etc). I've implemented this by verifying that the package was loaded with require(sna) and then do.call(snaFunName, args = args) The rDevel check is requesting that I use

This is a correction to my previous message, I forgot to swap two lines in the body of setMakeGenericMethod. Sorry about that. The correct (full message) reads like this: Hi, This works > setGeneric("clear", function(obj) standardGeneric("clear")) [1] "clear" but this doesn't. Why? > funName <- "clear" > setGeneric(funName,

Hi all! I have lots of functions called in the following pattern 'NameOfFunctionNumber' where the name always stays the same and the number varies from 1 to 98. Another function which I run in advance returns the number of the function which has to be called next. Now I want to combine 'NameOfFunction' with the 'Number' returned so that i can call the desired function. I

Hello everybody, I'm trying to use a if-statment on a function. For a better understanding I want to present a small example: FUN=mean # could also be median,sd or any other function if (FUN == mean) plot(...) if (FUN == median) plot(...) ... This doesn't work, because FUN is a function. I've already tried to coerce the

From: Sergei Golovan <sgolovan@gmail.com> Replace the use of liberl_interface, which is removed in Erlang 23, by libei. The implementation uses the ei_decode_iodata() function which has been introduces only for Erlang 23, so it doesnt work with earlier Erlang versions. --- erlang/Makefile.am | 1 - erlang/main.c | 312 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------

I added a couple of static probes to Firefox to measure actual work done. I could have used a pid$target probe with a function name but work is done within an if statement, which is where I placed the static probes. I''m wondering about my use, though. Is the following significantly more efficient than pid$target::FunName:entry and return? I heard somewhere that $target does not

Hi, I believe I came across a bug in RuntimeDyld. I have the following piece of C code (attached as rtdyldbug.c): double numbers[5] = {33, 34, 35, 36, 37}; void foo(double val, double other[]) { other[2] += val * numbers[4]; } I adapted llvm-rtdyld.cpp to load the .o file of the code above, get a pointer to foo, and invoke it (whole thing is attached as myrtdyld.cpp): typedef

It's not possible to define an action which takes a parameter called 'message' because the Erlang bindings use that as the name of an internal variable. Solve this by renaming the Erlang internal variable. Fixes commit 84763d7fca3668c62ee3fe53d0e00a5a672f687b. --- generator/erlang.ml | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git

do.call(sna::snaFunName, args = args) ? Hadley On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Skye Bender-deMoll <skyebend at skyeome.net> wrote: > Dear R-devel > > I have a function in a package that essentially provides a wrapper for a > group of functions in another Suggested package (it sets appropriate > defaults for the context, transforms output, etc). I've implemented this

Hi all, Does anybody know a better way to call functions than using 'eval'? I need to call functions which it's name is stored in a variable. Right now create the command string I'd like to run and then I run it using "eval". Running functions inside "eval" is starting annoying because it leads to a difficult error handling and difficult scenario to debug. So

I get an error when using self-defined (not standard) functions with mapply with S4 objects from the raster package that I develop: "Error in as.character(sys.call(sys.parent())[[1]]) : cannot coerce type 'closure' to vector of type 'character'". Does anyone understand why? The problem is illustrated below. Thanks, Robert > # First a general example that works

This is was something like a request for your comments, thoughts on the topic... Many of you will know that the "..." (aka \dots) argument is very useful for passing ``further graphical parameters'', but can be a pain when itself is passed to too many plotting functions inside your own function. An artificial example being myplot <- function(x,y, ...) { plot(0:1, 0:1,

QUESTION: Is there a way of passing arguments from an external file to a script so that they can be used directly by functions within the script? I have a series of interdependent functions. I wish to test the time for processing various datasets. I was initially doing something along the lines of the following (yes, I am new to R): rm(list= ls())

Hi. I'm pretty new to R, but I've been programming in other languages for some time. I have a couple of questions regarding programming with function objects. 1. Is there a way for a function to refer generically to all its actual arguments as a list? I'm thinking of something like the @_ array in Perl or the arguments variable in JavaScript. (By "actual" I mean the ones

Hadley, Overall seems like a cool and potentially really idea. I do have some thoughts/feedback, which I've put in-line below On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:31 AM, Hadley Wickham <h.wickham at gmail.com> wrote: > > <snip> > > conflicted applies a few heuristics to minimise false positives (at the > cost of introducing a few false negatives). The overarching goal is

Hi, Does anyone know how I can retrieve a function name, for example If I have a function f as follows: f <- function( myfunc ) { print( name_of(myfunc) ); } I want to know what I should have as "name_of" such that I could call this with : f( median ) and it would print "median" or f( my_function_name ) and it would print "m_function_name". So far all I

I have a function in R that takes another function as argument: f <- function(g, ...) { #g is expected to be a function } I want to see if there is a way to implement "f" in C and calling it from R using ".C" interface. I know that I can use function pointers for my C implementation, but I imagine it's going to be nearly impossible to pass a function from R to C. Are

Hi all, I?d love to get your feedback on the conflicted package, which provides an alternative strategy for resolving ambiugous function names (i.e. when multiple packages provide identically named functions). conflicted 0.1.0 is already on CRAN, but I?m currently preparing a revision (<https://github.com/r-lib/conflicted>), and looking for feedback. As you are no doubt aware, R?s default

I am trying to create a frequency distribution and I am a bit confused. Here are the commands I have entered: > data <- read.csv(file="40609_sortedfinal.csv",head=TRUE,sep=",") > NumberOfActionsByStatus = data$STATUS > NumberOfActionsByUser = data$ETS_LOGIN > NumberOfBidOffer = data$BID_OFFER > NumberOfActionsByUser.freq = table(NumberOfActionsByUser) >