search for: functy_3

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "functy_3".

2012 Jun 17
3
[LLVMdev] BlockAddress instruction is copied instead of cloned during module link?
...t;x86_64-unknown-freebsd8.2"); // Type Definitions PointerType* PointerTy_1 = PointerType::get(IntegerType::get(mod->getContext(), 8), 0); ArrayType* ArrayTy_0 = ArrayType::get(PointerTy_1, 3); PointerType* PointerTy_2 = PointerType::get(ArrayTy_0, 0); std::vector<Type*>FuncTy_3_args; FuncTy_3_args.push_back(IntegerType::get(mod->getContext(), 32)); FunctionType* FuncTy_3 = FunctionType::get( /*Result=*/PointerTy_1, /*Params=*/FuncTy_3_args, /*isVarArg=*/false); PointerType* PointerTy_4 = PointerType::get(PointerTy_1, 0); // Function Declarations...
2011 Apr 26
0
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
Hi Nabila, > where did the "noalias" attribute and "tail call" (rather than "call") come > from? Are you setting these yourself or running some optimization pass after > your pass? > > > i have written a module pass and i have compiled it and then you didn't answer my questions, you just repeated what you said before. Ciao,
2011 Apr 26
1
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
...e2 < hello.bc > /dev/null i put this opt -load /home/inspiron/PhdWork/llvm-2.8/Release/lib/Example.so -Example2 < hello.bc > hello2.bc the declaration is: PointerType* PointerTy_0 = PointerType::get(IntegerType::get(M.getContext(), 32), 0); std::vector<const Type*>FuncTy_3_args; FuncTy_3_args.push_back(IntegerType::get(M.getContext(), 32)); FuncTy_3_args.push_back(PointerTy_0); FunctionType* FuncTy_3 = FunctionType::get( /*Result=*/Type::getVoidTy(M.getContext()), /*Params=*/FuncTy_3_args,...
2011 Apr 26
2
[LLVMdev] inserting a fucntion call at the end of basic bloc
2011/4/26 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> > Hi Nabila, > > Now when i tried this pass an error says: >> Wrong type for attribute noalias >> tail call void @consume(i32 noalias 3, i32* @y) nounwind >> >> >> noalias is only for arguments of pointer type. You probably meant it >> to >> be on the second argument