Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "functuon".
Did you mean:
function
2019 Sep 26
2
[PATCH V2 5/8] mdev: introduce device specific ops
...arent;
if (likely(parent->ops->release))
parent->ops->release(mdev);
module_put(THIS_MODULE);
Does anything prevent the module from unloading at this point?
if not then ...
}
it looks like the implicit return (with instructions for argument pop
and functuon return) here can get overwritten on module
unload, causing a crash when executed.
IOW there's generally no way for module to keep a reference
to itself: it can take a reference but it needs someone else
to keep it and put.
--
MST
2019 Sep 26
2
[PATCH V2 5/8] mdev: introduce device specific ops
...arent;
if (likely(parent->ops->release))
parent->ops->release(mdev);
module_put(THIS_MODULE);
Does anything prevent the module from unloading at this point?
if not then ...
}
it looks like the implicit return (with instructions for argument pop
and functuon return) here can get overwritten on module
unload, causing a crash when executed.
IOW there's generally no way for module to keep a reference
to itself: it can take a reference but it needs someone else
to keep it and put.
--
MST
2019 Sep 26
0
[PATCH V2 5/8] mdev: introduce device specific ops
...parent->ops->release(mdev);
>
> module_put(THIS_MODULE);
>
> Does anything prevent the module from unloading at this point?
> if not then ...
>
>
> }
>
> it looks like the implicit return (with instructions for argument pop
> and functuon return) here can get overwritten on module
> unload, causing a crash when executed.
>
> IOW there's generally no way for module to keep a reference
> to itself: it can take a reference but it needs someone else
> to keep it and put.
I'd always assumed this would exit cleanl...
2019 Sep 25
3
[PATCH V2 5/8] mdev: introduce device specific ops
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 4:52 AM Tian, Kevin <kevin.tian at intel.com> wrote:
> > From: Alex Williamson
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 7:07 AM
> >
> > On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 21:53:29 +0800
> > Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Currently, except for the create and remove, the rest of
> > > mdev_parent_ops is
2019 Sep 25
3
[PATCH V2 5/8] mdev: introduce device specific ops
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 4:52 AM Tian, Kevin <kevin.tian at intel.com> wrote:
> > From: Alex Williamson
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 7:07 AM
> >
> > On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 21:53:29 +0800
> > Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Currently, except for the create and remove, the rest of
> > > mdev_parent_ops is